I can't believe none of the papers published the pictures, which are all over the web including twitter and facebook, is this 2012 or the 1940's?
Because it is a non story?
But especially for tabloids it's not, it would sell thousands of extra copies, The Sun even did a mock up picture to try and attract extra buyers. Royal stories like this are gold dust and they have backed away from it due to pressure from on high
and, in my view, rightly so.
I am very much a Royalist and not a fan of the UK print press, haven't read a daily paper for 10 years but it seems amazing the power the establishment still have over us
Maybe, and it is a long shot i'll admit, the tabloids are growing up a bit.
Nope, it is because they are all sh1t scared about what the Leveson inquiry is going to recommend. They are playing ball because they don't want Leveson recommendations to be made any worse.
They printed pics of Fergie (Sarah, not the red faced Scottish one) don't forget.
There is that. Missed the Fergie one's - what's she done now then?
Do you forget the photo's of topless toe sucking of some bald headed Texan around a private pool....taken via a paparazzi's telescopic photo lens?
I am very much a Royalist and not a fan of the UK print press, haven't read a daily paper for 10 years but it seems amazing the power the establishment still have over us
Blimey, just clicked on your link - that's a helluva story, and makes you take stock of your own situation.
Hope you're doing OK.