Yep. Happy to have a shirt sponsor that is A: Not a gambling website, B: Real money rather than an FFP dodge from the owners and C: Not Angry Birds on the sleeve.As said before American Express appears to represent excellent value if the alternative is a load of Chinese script for a gambling site.
If those numbers are correct, our deal looks utterly shithouse.
However, it may be the case that if you're not one of the big names, don't have a Far Eastern owner who wants to peddle his Far Eastern wares and don't want to go down the gambling route, then earnings are far reduced.
Aren't we tied in for x number of years? However, I'm glad it's not some awful gambling site.
Probably, but there's no way on earth we'd not have included a "If we get promoted to the Premier League" clause.
45% of Premier League teams main sponsors are gambling companies. That's a bit worrying for society.
45% of Premier League teams main sponsors are gambling companies. That's a bit worrying for society.
Personally, I'd like to see gambling companies prohibited from shirt sponsorship, much like booze and fag companies.
Most gambling companies deal in hoovering up money from the poor and stupid. If you know anything about what Bloom does then you'd get that it's totally and completely different. Probably difficult for you to grasp though, or maybe it was just another cheap and incorrect shot.I would rather we had Amex and not some gambling company. I'm glad that Bloom would not be involved in anything as distasteful as that.
Personally, I'd like to see gambling companies prohibited from shirt sponsorship, much like booze and fag companies.