SIMMO SAYS
Well-known member
:I didn’t realise he was joking! Where’s the smiley face?
:I didn’t realise he was joking! Where’s the smiley face?
Thanks for all you've shared on this thread - really interesting to read. Totally agree on Mourinho, at first he came across as self-aware and even gently self-mocking at times but increasingly seemed bitter and disinterested. Sad is definitely the word.
It's not often I read a thread on NSC and think I can actually offer anything more meaningful than a pitiful attempt at humour but this aligns a bit with what I do for a living. In a way I still find bizarre and with enormous imposter syndrome, (and this is impossible to talk about without sounding like it's an outtake from Twenty Twelve) part of what I get paid for is helping people in the corporate world develop emotional intelligence and use neuroscience and psychology to perform better - a lot of what I bring in to what I do is from sport but also the arts because cinema (for example) is amazing for all this too.
I could geek about it for DAYS but instead what I'll point out is the entirely obvious and that one of the key attributes of successful leadership is role-modelling of the behaviours you want to see in others. Combine that with emotional intelligence to bring the best out of people and consciously adapt to meet them where they need you rather than where you need them and it's basically a super-power. Read anything about Fergie at United and this was him too.
Like Fergie at United, Potter's been given time which is essential for it to work. So if we think about what behaviours Potter is role-modelling in public, and how that's going to be amplified massively in private with the players, you can also see how that now comes through them too in the way they play and talk and perform. It's in Potter's interviews too - he wants them to develop personally as well as professionally, he sees football as a means to players becoming better people too etc etc. Watching Potter is like a textbook in emotional intelligence training brought to glorious life - he'll be doing most of it innately I reckon, because he seems like a very decent bloke who just "gets" people, but the academic side he's got will absolutely give the confidence and evidence-base to press on when things are looking less pleasant if he's doubting himself.
There's masses and masses in emotional intelligence work about how you create a culture of trust in a team and you can see that in his work, and that rounded development of people and the seeing them as "more than their jobs" that Potter does is a huge part of it. You can see that trust then come through on the pitch. Want to play March or whoever out of position? That's the consequence of 12 months working on them as a full human being to build their trust in your judgement as well as their own judgement as much as it's working on them tactically as a player. Another biiiiiiiig part of that is constantly demonstrating you have someone's best interests at heart. So if you're an Albion player and working with Potter is helping you be a better husband / father / human and you can see how it's setting you up for life after the game too you're going to love him and trust him more than anything. It's no wonder they look such a happy bunch. It's not just the players Potter will be influencing and even working with either, it'll be the whole set up at the club he'll be driving, because if the security guy is happy, positive and focused on the same things as Trossard that actually makes a difference. Southgate, for whatever his faults, has done an amazing emotional intelligence job with England and knowing a bit about how he's used psychologists and organisation design specialists to map all the player touch-points (God, I hate corporate speak) it's similar to Brighton and Potter - everyone an England player encounters at any point in their time with the England team has the same ethos, attitude, values, approach, and common language talking about things (e.g. it's never "we'll try" unless by mistake, it's always "we will"...they never "understand" because that's hard to measure, they "demonstrate they can" etc etc). It's small things, but Southgate attributed some of the success in Russia with these changes and the fact the people who serve up food in the canteen are part of a whole experience for everyone that reinforces an attitude and approach.
The "us against the world" team building of Mourinho has a limited shelf-life for trust which is why he always falls apart spectacularly. I love watching Tuchel constantly blaming things outside of his control too because it's going to implode massively soon (people who constantly feel they have no autonomy over their outcomes, as the Chelsea team will be feeling because it's never their fault, never sustain any kind of success - you can't be permanently angry and feeling powerless and if you're unaccountable for failure your brain will automatically cap how accountable you feel you can be for success...they might still win stuff, but not as much as they could have). I know Howe isn't popular but I reckon he's probably pretty good on EI. Moyes too. Klopp will be great at it. I suspect Arteta is rubbish. Lampard won't be good because he seems to have too much of an ego and victim complex, Gerrard though - like Guardiola - isn't worried about a bit of vulnerability occasionally so I think is probably good too. Rogers I reckon has read all the books and is good at applying it but doesn't have it innately so it'll always be management theory and not "lived".
Anyway. I'm geeking FOR DAYS if I don't stop now. It'll be a sad day when Potter goes, but again, if you listen to him he talks about how Bloom and Barber role-model behaviours (Barber's legendary accessibility to us randoms for example is amazing role-modelling of wanting to ensure we all feel valued even if we disagree about something - everyone feeling valued being a core of emotional intelligence) so we can be sure whoever the next manager is will be a continuation on a theme and style, and that can only be a good thing. From the bit of research I've done into it for work I think Liverpool are the closest Premier League club to us in that style of operating where emotional intelligence and "whole player" work is the norm, that's why I tipped Potter to be Klopp's successor unless he goes straight to the England manager job. I think he could walk into either and not have a big cultural rebuilding job and that'd suit Potter and either Liverpool or England a lot.
The only other thing I'll say, and I can do this with absolute authority on the topic, is that I wish I had Potter's beard.
Emotional intelligence….. He’s Bruce Lee
I didn’t realise he was joking! Where’s the smiley face?
Thank you. So, coming at this from very much an outside perspective I agree, I suspect he over-thinks everything and is incredibly sensitive to criticism. There's enormous amounts of work in sports psychology about how you can't think "don't slice it / don't miss" etc. Negative thinking in that way interrupts your instinctive, trained, practiced ability - most penalty players who miss the target or fluff badly it'll be because they are thinking "don't miss" or something along those lines. Gary Speed (scored 13, missed 2) used to say he never picked where he was going to shoot, he'd practiced it a million times so just went through the motions, he only thought what direction he'd run in to celebrate. I reckon Maupay is so worried about missing it becomes self-perpetuating which is why we see more instinctive goals from him than considered or planned ones - if he has time to think "don't miss" then he does.
I thought last season Maupay scored a couple of cracking goals and the thing that struck me about them is that they were both no look, instinctive shots (one was an overhead kick IIRC). When he doesn't overthink it, he has an instinct for goal. But when he has more of a look at goal before shooting it seems like he gets in his own head and ends up overdoing it. He needs Jedi training. He needs to turn off his targeting computer.
Thanks for all you've shared on this thread - really interesting to read. Totally agree on Mourinho, at first he came across as self-aware and even gently self-mocking at times but increasingly seemed bitter and disinterested. Sad is definitely the word.
Thank you for this a decent read and goes to show how deep EI can go.
Out of interest, are there any observations for managing players who have come back from long term / serious injury (I’m thinking March & Lamptey as examples) and the theory of getting them to believe in themselves again whilst omitting the fear of further injury all be it subconsciously?
Thanks
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I thought last season Maupay scored a couple of cracking goals and the thing that struck me about them is that they were both no look, instinctive shots (one was an overhead kick IIRC). When he doesn't overthink it, he has an instinct for goal. But when he has more of a look at goal before shooting it seems like he gets in his own head and ends up overdoing it. He needs Jedi training. He needs to turn off his targeting computer.
<<SNIP>>
Meanwhile he will need to have strategies to deal with his own issues, the ones that can befall us to differing degrees: self-doubt, overconfidence, being too emotional after a win or defeat, seeming to be indifferent whether we win or lose, over-explaining, under-explaining, wanting to be too matey with players, being too aloof, being too ambitious, being too comfortable, trying too hard, being complacent, etc.
<<SNIP>>
Great question. So I don't know how the club does it but I would think this is where it's all the more important the manager recognises players as being more than their job. If someone's value and self-worth is tied up in playing and performing then injury will be a major setback that'll give their confidence a hit and create that fear of not wanting to go back to that place through being injured again. If they've got other roles in the team though - formal or informal - they're still adding value even with the frustration of not playing so their self-esteem, sense of worth etc stays high, as does their connection to their teammates. It won't completely resolve it but fear of injury will come from more than just being hurt or not being able to play, and as many of those fears as possible that can be catered for will help. This might sound relatively trite to some but even talking about it before it happens can help prevent catastrophising about something: getting a player to talk through what worries them when they play and doing a rationalisation exercise can help with confidence. I know of an international hockey player who did this as a why/because exercise (I'm scared I'll get injured...why? Because then I can't play...why? Because...) and regularly reminded himself that if he didn't commit in a way that might get himself injured he wouldn't be picked for the team anyway, and all the times he'd been injured before he'd come back again.
Again, I'm guessing, but I would imagine Potter's done some work around people's personal values and motivations too - Lamptey seems to be motivated by a strong social conscience. Making opportunities and space to turn up that part of his role at the club when he's injured means the work he's doing is still rewarding for him and he'll value that he's able to do work that satisfies that part of his drive. Being valued, being recognised as more than what you do for a living, is all part of that confidence and trust building so when Potter and the physio say you're ready, you know you're ready. (See Welbeck celebrating every goal with someone who appears to be a physio for example - so much trust and value.) Every player will have something - their "why" that is more than playing football, and if Potter and the club can provide an outlet for that they are onto a winner, especially when a player is injured.
There's some quite good stuff around reframing setback and failure too as just being a deviation from the path, not a change of direction. Pull a hamstring and it doesn't mean you're not a great footballer anymore, you just adapt your training and take a longer route but the destination is still the same. The idea is it takes the sting out of an event by seeing it as bump required a detour rather than block requiring a u-turn.
I know I've slagged off Mourinho's approach but he paraphrased Nelson Mandela and said you never lose, you win or you learn - that's a very Potter-esque approach to setback too.
Kinda related to the injury question, I do wonder how we handle keeping in touch with loanees and making sure they feel connected back to the club and not forgotten. I'm guess GP is probably very busy and so can't exactly check in with every loan player all that often, but I wonder if there's somebody at the club with that specific duty to talk to our loan players, make sure they are settled in and reasonably happy and let them know we haven't forgotten them.
I could imagine some clubs, especially back in the day, would exile players on loan and have very little contact until the loan was over. I'd hope that rarely happens nowadays.