bhaexpress
New member
I've never really thought Elvis songs were all that either. I guess it's more about the new ground they were breaking at the time.
Elvis didn't write his own sings, The Beatles did.
I've never really thought Elvis songs were all that either. I guess it's more about the new ground they were breaking at the time.
I can't think of many bands who have innovated music and helped create genres so successfully since.
Only Pink Floyd and Radiohead come to mind, and neither of them has done so to the extent that The Beatles did.
I am a Beatles fan but I admit there is SOME truth in the 'right place right time' theory. They were well handled by their manager, Brian Epstein, in much the same way that Malcolm MacClaren knew how to market the Sex Pistols. Plus they were lucky to meet up with an excellent producer (George Martin) who was able to accdurately get their ideas down on tape they way they wanted them.
However the one thing that made them almost unique was that they were virtually the first band to play and record their own songs. Up until that time groups tended to play compositions written for them by professional songwriters and the Beatles ushered in a whole new 'singer/songwriter' era. And bugger me, speaking as a published songwriter and a PRS member (boast boast), their songs were GOOD.
If you don't like 'em you don't like 'em - fair enough. But there was a little bit more about them then simply being 'the first boy band'.
What about Depeche Mode
I'm saying the "atmosphere" and more specifically the drum beat in Tomorrow Never Knows was a massive influence on a number of dance bands/acts etc. It's certainly the first modern dance song I've ever heard, can you think of an earlier example?
Well James Tenney was sampling in the early Sixties, Collage #1 being a good example. That track doesn't have drums in it but could easily be pointed to as an example of a song that created the dance genre (even though you'd be hard pushed to actually dance to it.
The most important innovations in modern dance music- the 'four to the floor' beat, sampling, dub production techniques etc all seem to originate from early 'black music'. The Beatles produced a few songs that modern dance acts (especially the British techno/big beat clan of the mid-late nineties) are reminiscent of.
BUT, without Ragtime, Jazz, Blues, Dub, Ska, Reggae, Disco etc there would be no/to little modern dance music. If the Beatles had never existed you can be sure dance music still would (as, i'd suggest would the likes of the Chemical Brothers). IMHO.
I'm a big fan as you know, but are they that innovative?
Fair enough. I just think a band as BIG as the Beatles taking those sorta risks was important for opening people's minds to new forms of music, and helped to speed up the process.
Plus it is an absolute TUNE, isn't it? Ringo's best ever moment I reckon (that is if it wasn't Paul, as rumoured).
Of course I wasn't there at the time, so am probably talking out of my ARSE.
1. Its about LSD.
2. Not a Beatles song.
I think you will find bands and individuals that say that they were influenced by Depeche Mode.
I was influenced by my mum, but I didn't invent a music genre.
Bit off topic but I like your signature, just how the game should be
I was influenced by my mum, but I didn't invent a music genre.
I am a Beatles fan but I admit there is SOME truth in the 'right place right time' theory. They were well handled by their manager, Brian Epstein, in much the same way that Malcolm MacClaren knew how to market the Sex Pistols. Plus they were lucky to meet up with an excellent producer (George Martin) who was able to accdurately get their ideas down on tape they way they wanted them.
However the one thing that made them almost unique was that they were virtually the first band to play and record their own songs. Up until that time groups tended to play compositions written for them by professional songwriters and the Beatles ushered in a whole new 'singer/songwriter' era. And bugger me, speaking as a published songwriter and a PRS member (boast boast), their songs were GOOD.
If you don't like 'em you don't like 'em - fair enough. But there was a little bit more about them then simply being 'the first boy band'.
Ok what about the use of sampling. Techno was influenced by Depeche Mode
No it's not about LSD - it is about Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds, a painting that Julian Lennon did at school.
Apart from the fact there first couple of lps that were soaked with Carl Perkins and Buddy Holly Covers !! And on that note were not buddy holly and the crickets not a band that wrote nearly all there own material and then the beatles even copied there name, because they were such a big influance All this bollox about how unique they were is trash. No band is unique they all take form other musical influances. Be it Blues, Boogie, Skiffle, Rock n roll, What ever. Right time, Right place maybe they can be the FIRST BRITISH COMMERCIAL BOY BAND thats it.
Now i will crawl back in my hole.