Robot Chicken
Seriously?
It's now 119 seconds.
Oh funny, ha-ha.
Oh funny, ha-ha.
Easy 10 said:"Sorry! The administrator has specified that users can only post one message every 119 seconds."
HOORAY, PROGRESS
Easy 10 said:"Sorry! The administrator has specified that users can only post one message every 119 seconds."
HOORAY, PROGRESS
Its a small price to pay WW.Withdean Wanderer said:So if we keep protesting until approximately 1am on Saturday morning, we'll have it back to its original 30 seconds, just in time for Saturday evenings inevitable 'Kerry Mayo - Why?'debate!
:dance: :dance:
Well I would, but unfortunately I can't post the letter for another 119 seconds. I'm afraid that by then I will be slumped across my keyboard in a drunken stupour, and will probably have forgotten about it by the morning.The Complete Badger said:We need LETTERS. Who can we write to to show how disillusioned we are with this decision? Prescott?
Bozza said:The barometer swings.
123
Wozza said:I think we should experiment with allowing everyone just 1 post every 24 hours.
Withdean Wanderer said:Childish Ramblings?
Moderating Decisions Forum?
Yellow Cards (handed out for posting polls about ANIMALS? please!)
Seems to be getting a bit 'power crazy'!
You single me out, yet today (by my own admission) i've posted on one 'shit' thread (which, incidently, hasn't been moved to Childish Ramblings), i've posted two threads about the football (the primary purpose of this forum?!), one asking about original posters of NSC, and asked one GENUINE question about Vera Duckworth (it's one of the nations most popular soaps, and it's relatively topical seeing as there is already a thread about Betty!).
Now, one crap thread can easily be moved to the Ramblings if you're THAT annoyed with it. But what about all the other 'shit threads'? And all this 'flouncing' bollocks. Surely you can't be annoyed at everyone who posts in the 'shit threads'? Or you'd be annoyed at pretty much the whole forum!?
Yeh, i've probably made 50 posts today. But that's what happens when I've got the day off, with only PC based work to do. But slowing the board down, just to keep me (and a few others) quiet, overall, is going to be more damaging to NSC than it is beneficial. It's only really one user who is CONSISTENTLY criticised by MOST for poor postings (not me).
Does a freak couple of days really mean that NSC needs changing so much?
Withdean Wanderer said:Childish Ramblings?
Moderating Decisions Forum?
Yellow Cards (handed out for posting polls about ANIMALS? please!)
Seems to be getting a bit 'power crazy'!
Bozza said:...and as I disappear off into the evening, I've set it to 90 (seconds, not minutes)...
ben andrews' girlfriend said:I can see what you mean, but 2 minutes is a bit extreme - maybe a minute is better? I know that i get caught with the 30 second one every once in a while.
The Complete Badger said:But then everyone would lie about their age