LamieRobertson
Not awoke
Phew no singing but it hasn’t mentioned no shouting abuse at the ref...excellent
*there. That is embarrassing and I can’t edit it. [emoji849]
Right, that's it, I'm doing my flounce now - I have heard enough shit from stupid people, but comparing hot weather to a Pandemic is just beyond stupid... The lot of you can just **** off, enjoy your football and goodbye
The transport for me is the big issue. I can't be arsed to pick the bones out of whatever disagreement seems to have already happened around this, but train over-crowding is the obvious issue and, as I wrote when we were discussing this months back, it feels somewhat perverse that our reliance on public transport options could very well be a burden in Covid-world.
There are three mitigations however...
- Reduced capacity. At 25%, that's quite a reduction in demand on the trains.
- Parking. There must be pretty decent capacity across the University car parks, The Bridge and Bennett's Field that could absorb a fair few thousand people. Depending on how ticket allocations work, you could almost make a case for car park priority going to families/bubbles of 3/4+ people so that car parking is optimally utilised in terms of number of fans that use this transport option, reducing the demand on trains and buses.
- Phased arrivals - the least attractive mitigation. Who wants to turn up, say, 2 hours before the game? Beyond that, phased departures are difficult to implement, particularly if there is limited/no concourse options.
- Parking. There must be pretty decent capacity across the University car parks, The Bridge and Bennett's Field that could absorb a fair few thousand people. Depending on how ticket allocations work, you could almost make a case for car park priority going to families/bubbles of 3/4+ people so that car parking is optimally utilised in terms of number of fans that use this transport option, reducing the demand on trains and buses.
.
They might even shut Falmer station before and after the game ?If trains were seen as a problem- maybe they could restrict travel to car / cycling / walking only. With 25% capacity I guess enough people could come by those routes to take all the tickets.
The number of cars coming are limited by the amount of parking available, so I guess that would be maxed out plus more walkers and cyclists. Might need more cycle stands at the stadium.
The transport for me is the big issue. I can't be arsed to pick the bones out of whatever disagreement seems to have already happened around this, but train over-crowding is the obvious issue and, as I wrote when we were discussing this months back, it feels somewhat perverse that our reliance on public transport options could very well be a burden in Covid-world.
There are three mitigations however...
- Reduced capacity. At 25%, that's quite a reduction in demand on the trains.
- Parking. There must be pretty decent capacity across the University car parks, The Bridge and Bennett's Field that could absorb a fair few thousand people. Depending on how ticket allocations work, you could almost make a case for car park priority going to families/bubbles of 3/4+ people so that car parking is optimally utilised in terms of number of fans that use this transport option, reducing the demand on trains and buses.
- Phased arrivals - the least attractive mitigation. Who wants to turn up, say, 2 hours before the game? Beyond that, phased departures are difficult to implement, particularly if there is limited/no concourse options.
They might even shut Falmer station before and after the game ?
Is there parking capacity not previously used on match day ? I haven’t been to the Uni for many years (since we took the kids to an open training day prior to the centenary celebrations) but remember there being a lot of parking.