[NSC] Pop-up ads at bottom of page

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊













Guinness Boy

Tofu eating wokerati
Helpful Moderator
NSC Patron
Jul 23, 2003
37,339
Up and Coming Sunny Portslade
To save a load of posts the boss tells me this is a new thing and currently only on mobile. I’ll let him explain more (or not) but for now you’ll get it on mobile and not on p.c.
 






Bozza

You can change this
Helpful Moderator
Jul 4, 2003
57,284
Back in Sussex
I'm surprised the dissent took this long - I turned it on around 3:30!

It's just an experiment which I knew would be unpopular.

Ads now pay primarily on viewability so the regular banners deployed on the site are relatively poor payers are they aren't on screen often/for very long - c57%. In contrast the sticky bottom banner, which has been used for non-logged in users for a while, gets seen 88% of the time.

I thought it would be less intrusive on mobile, rather than desktop, but I wonder if the opposite is true.

That style of ad is used on a lot of sites, but maybe it's the way it appears, instead of being there when the page renders, which makes it more jarring.
 






Cheshire Cat

The most curious thing..
I'm surprised the dissent took this long - I turned it on around 3:30!

It's just an experiment which I knew would be unpopular.

Ads now pay primarily on viewability so the regular banners deployed on the site are relatively poor payers are they aren't on screen often/for very long - c57%. In contrast the sticky bottom banner, which has been used for non-logged in users for a while, gets seen 88% of the time.

I thought it would be less intrusive on mobile, rather than desktop, but I wonder if the opposite is true.

That style of ad is used on a lot of sites, but maybe it's the way it appears, instead of being there when the page renders, which makes it more jarring.
it's bloody irritating, especially on a phone obscuring part of a comparatively small screen.

It makes NSC look like an unreadable newspaper free website, with random popups all over.
 








Grizz

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Jul 5, 2003
1,494
I don't think it's that bad, at least it's blends in better than genuine square or rectangular pop ups that take up a third or half the lower part of the screen. Prefer not to have them, but worth the experiment.
 








Seagull27

Well-known member
Feb 7, 2011
3,368
Bristol
Can't say they bother me too much, so no real complaints, but maybe it depends on screen size. Slightly worse when you've got your keyboard open.

It is the sort of ad you tend to get on shoddy news websites like the argus, or the sun, though
 






Normal Rob

Well-known member
Jul 8, 2003
5,795
Somerset

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230307_184111_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20230307_184111_Chrome.jpg
    613.4 KB · Views: 119




schmunk

Why oh why oh why?
Jan 19, 2018
10,346
Mid mid mid Sussex
I'm surprised the dissent took this long - I turned it on around 3:30!

It's just an experiment which I knew would be unpopular.

Ads now pay primarily on viewability so the regular banners deployed on the site are relatively poor payers are they aren't on screen often/for very long - c57%. In contrast the sticky bottom banner, which has been used for non-logged in users for a while, gets seen 88% of the time.

I thought it would be less intrusive on mobile, rather than desktop, but I wonder if the opposite is true.

That style of ad is used on a lot of sites, but maybe it's the way it appears, instead of being there when the page renders, which makes it more jarring.
A static banner ad of the same size would be (I think) less annoying, and visible 100% of the time
 


A1X

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Sep 1, 2017
20,537
Deepest, darkest Sussex
DF8BC15C-8623-446D-AE08-501E4F61135F.png
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top