Player ratings v Leicester

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊







Petee

Well-known member
Nov 22, 2010
3,031
Brighton
Ryan 6

Bruno 7
Duffy 7
Dunk 7
Suttner 6

March 7 MOTM
Stephens 5.5
Propper 6
Murphy 6.5

Groß 5.5

Murray 6

Knockaert 6.5
Hemed 6
 


JC Footy Genius

Bringer of TRUTH
Jun 9, 2015
10,568
Ryan - Hard to see how much at fault he was for the first goal so 6
Bruno - made some good forward runs/solid 7
Duffy - 7
Dunk - 7
Suttner 6
March - 7
Stephens - 6
Pröpper - improved as the game went on 6
Murphy - meh 5
Groß - very poor 4 Substituted for Knockaert lively 6
Murray - 5 past it Substituted for Hemed showed fight 6
 










Iggle Piggle

Well-known member
Sep 3, 2010
5,987
Ryan 3. Disaster zone. 1st goal could have better, dallied with ball at his feet and clearly Dunk / Duffy have confidence issues judging by the body language. Laughable let in during kickabout at half time.
Suttner 5. Let Mahrez through for 1st goal but otherwise kept him quiet. Got forward more than city but....
Duffy 6. Played well but the Japanese lad should have scored when he ghosted in front of him.
Dunk 7 played well including goal line clearance.
Bruno 7. Combined with March well and got forward. No sign of slowing up.
Murphy 7. I wasnt convinced last week but he did well today albeit most attacking penetration came from the other wing
Stephens 5. Still playing at Championship speed. Needs to get up to pace of PL and stop being robbed of the ball
Propper. 5. Profligate in possession again but he did show glimpses of what he could do and how he might run the midfield in future.
March 7.5 MOM. Threatening further up pitch this week.
Gross 6.5 like Propper he showed glimpses of what he can do.
Murray. 5.5 Better than Hemed last week but we need another striker at this level. Maguire had him in his pocket.

Knockeart 7. The Leicester fans were ad glad to see him as we were.
Hemed 6. Looked more at home than last week but still feel Championship is his level.
 


SuperMario

PLAY IT!
Sep 6, 2006
580
Ryan - Hard to see how much at fault he was for the first goal so 6
Bruno - made some good forward runs/solid 7
Duffy - 7
Dunk - 7
Suttner 6
March - 7
Stephens - 6
Pröpper - improved as the game went on 6
Murphy - meh 5
Groß - very poor 4 Substituted for Knockaert lively 6
Murray - 5 past it Substituted for Hemed showed fight 6

Pretty much this i thought Suttner/Murphy just didnt work well together
 






Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
69,376
Withdean area
Ryan - Hard to see how much at fault he was for the first goal so 6
Bruno - made some good forward runs/solid 7
Duffy - 7
Dunk - 7
Suttner 6
March - 7
Stephens - 6
Pröpper - improved as the game went on 6
Murphy - meh 5
Groß - very poor 4 Substituted for Knockaert lively 6
Murray - 5 past it Substituted for Hemed showed fight 6

Murphy hater? The general consensus amongst fans and the media, was that Propper had a shocker.
 


Ⓩ-Ⓐ-Ⓜ-Ⓞ-Ⓡ-Ⓐ

Hove / Παρος
Apr 7, 2006
6,774
Hove / Παρος
The statistical ratings...

Duffy MOM followed by Knocky

Screen Shot 2017-08-19 at 13.24.25.png
 




Kuipers Supporters Club

Well-known member
Feb 10, 2009
5,770
GOSBTS
Ryan 4

Bruno 7 MOM
Dunk 7
Duffy 6.5
Suttner 5

March 6
Pröpper 5
Stephens 5.5
Murphy 5.5

Groß 5
Murray 6

Knockaert 7
Hemed 6.5
 


JC Footy Genius

Bringer of TRUTH
Jun 9, 2015
10,568
Murphy hater? The general consensus amongst fans and the media, was that Propper had a shocker.

No, I just didn't notice him and presented little forward threat. Propper had a poor/average first half but improved in the second, struck a superb sweeping 40-yard ball to feet second half.
 






One Teddy Maybank

Well-known member
NSC Patron
Aug 4, 2006
23,011
Worthing
Just back.

Very poor.

6=average

Ryan 4
Bruno 6
Suttner 4
Duffy 9 best player on the pitch for either side for me. Awesome.
Dunk 8
Murphy 5 - terrible decision making, can't tackle
Stephens 5.5 - offered nothing offensively
Propper 5.5 - see Stephens
March 5.5 - played well for 25 mins then poor.
Gross 4
Murray 5

Knockaert 6 because he pressed immediately and looked dangerous
Hemed 5.5

Ref - 4

Very p!ssed off. We had 55% possession the majority of which was on the halfway line or in our own half.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 






studio150

Well-known member
Jul 30, 2011
30,252
On the Border
Just back.

Very poor.

6=average

Ryan 4
Bruno 6
Suttner 4
Duffy 9 best player on the pitch for either side for me. Awesome.
Dunk 8
Murphy 5 - terrible decision making, can't tackle
Stephens 5.5 - offered nothing offensively
Propper 5.5 - see Stephens
March 5.5 - played well for 25 mins then poor.
Gross 4
Murray 5

Knockaert 6 because he pressed immediately and looked dangerous
Hemed 5.5

Ref - 4

Very p!ssed off. We had 55% possession the majority of which was on the halfway line or in our own half.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Duffy 9?

I must have missed him being beaten from the corner for their 2nd. Distribution at times poor.
 




Weststander

Well-known member
Aug 25, 2011
69,376
Withdean area
We had 55% possession the majority of which was on the halfway line or in our own half.

Possession stats don't mean much.

Leicester, Stoke, WBA .... all effective PL teams don't mind being pointlessly out passed in non dangerous areas. Then scoring sucker punches.

Something CH perfected in the Championship. We were fantastic at counter attacking or grabbing improbable winners.
 


DJ NOBO

Well-known member
Jul 18, 2004
6,821
Wiltshire
Early days etc but without the knockaert factor we look like a team that is waiting to lose.

It's not even as if jamie Murphy offers much defensively. He does his best but he's an average championship player.

As for Propper. He reminds me of Ryan Harley. Enough said.
 


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top