Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Pfizer Top Secret Document Leaked



colinz

Banned
Oct 17, 2010
862
Auckland
I've pretty much kept out of the whole Covid debate, being in a situation where I could decide not to get vaccinated.

Came across this document, just thought to myself glad I'm not vaccinated. Started reading the explosive pages 30-39.
Decided to start posting it when someone sent me a short video explaining it.
I'm realistic in not expecting it to be posted here for long.

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

https://rumble.com/vw9lz1-pfizers-top-secret-document-leaked-stfn-report.html
 








dsr-burnley

Well-known member
Aug 15, 2014
2,625
I've pretty much kept out of the whole Covid debate, being in a situation where I could decide not to get vaccinated.

Came across this document, just thought to myself glad I'm not vaccinated. Started reading the explosive pages 30-39.
Decided to start posting it when someone sent me a short video explaining it.
I'm realistic in not expecting it to be posted here for long.

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

https://rumble.com/vw9lz1-pfizers-top-secret-document-leaked-stfn-report.html
Feedback 1 - it's not top secret. It's a document available to lots of people at Pfizer and also regulatory authorities.

Feedback 2 - I don't know how many Pfizer jabs have been jabbed worldwide, but 1,223 people who have been jabbed, died shortly afterwards. The obvious conclusion from this is that Pfizer jabs do not confer immortality. I suspect a similar report about medical cases and fatalities of people who had bacon and eggs for breakfast would produce a much worse figure.

Feedback 3 - the list of illnesses on pages 30-39 is the list that - IF the jab causes side effects - are the illnesses most likely to result. You need a vivid imagination to think it's explosive. Genuine tip - rahter than looking out for flat earthers and other lunatics to tell you what you already believe, why not try giving a little thought on your own account?
 








Fat Boy Fat

New member
Aug 21, 2020
1,077
Feedback 1 - it's not top secret. It's a document available to lots of people at Pfizer and also regulatory authorities.

Feedback 2 - I don't know how many Pfizer jabs have been jabbed worldwide, but 1,223 people who have been jabbed, died shortly afterwards. The obvious conclusion from this is that Pfizer jabs do not confer immortality. I suspect a similar report about medical cases and fatalities of people who had bacon and eggs for breakfast would produce a much worse figure.

Feedback 3 - the list of illnesses on pages 30-39 is the list that - IF the jab causes side effects - are the illnesses most likely to result. You need a vivid imagination to think it's explosive. Genuine tip - rahter than looking out for flat earthers and other lunatics to tell you what you already believe, why not try giving a little thought on your own account?

At least they didn't use the words cover up or mention MSM!
 








Eric the meek

Fiveways Wilf
NSC Patron
Aug 24, 2020
7,091
I've pretty much kept out of the whole Covid debate, being in a situation where I could decide not to get vaccinated.

Came across this document, just thought to myself glad I'm not vaccinated. Started reading the explosive pages 30-39.
Decided to start posting it when someone sent me a short video explaining it.
I'm realistic in not expecting it to be posted here for long.

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

https://rumble.com/vw9lz1-pfizers-top-secret-document-leaked-stfn-report.html

What did you think of the feedback?
 






colinz

Banned
Oct 17, 2010
862
Auckland
OK my go to guy for all Covid related stuff, has finally had a look at the same document which I posted.

His interpretation of pages 30-38 are that these reactions did happen, but for all we know there may only be 1or 2 in each instance, although he is alarmed by the large number of different types of adverse reactions.

Also he's concerned that the actual number of vaccinations given could have been redacted. Making it difficult to work out a % of adverse reactions from the vaccination.

What did I think of the feedback? (answer) OK.

 
Last edited:


colinz

Banned
Oct 17, 2010
862
Auckland
OK guys time for some more feedback, since some of you may work in the City in stocks & shares, investments etc. maybe some feedback on what the link below actually means.


Happy to be ridiculed, hoping to get at least some usefull information.

Pfizer just filed a form 25 with the security exchange commission (SEC)

You file a form 25 if your shares are worthless, or if you want to go private or IF YOU NO LONGER WANT TO BE SUBJECT TO STRICT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
I have spent over 23 years in investing on the US markets and first time we have seen this form - only possible reasons would be liquidation, bankruptcy, listing on other exchange, name change (administrative filing), company acquired and name not remaining - wtf?


https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/78003/000087666122000258/xslF25X02/primary_doc.xml#

I suppose it's possible Pfizer want to be listed on another exchange.
 
Last edited:


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,014
OK guys time for some more feedback, since some of you may work in the City in stocks & shares, investments etc. maybe some feedback on what the link below actually means.


Happy to be ridiculed, hoping to get at least some usefull information.




https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/78003/000087666122000258/xslF25X02/primary_doc.xml#

I suppose it's possible Pfizer want to be listed on another exchange.

the claimed reporting requirements will be financial reporting. a private (or worthless) pharma company would still have to report on their clinical trails, contrary to what this false info is trying to spin.
the filing lists the class of security "0.250% Notes due 2022", that'll be some bond or preference share issue being withdrawn. not Pfizer.
you'd have learnt this by reading the responses to the tweet you got it from.
 




colinz

Banned
Oct 17, 2010
862
Auckland
the claimed reporting requirements will be financial reporting. a private (or worthless) pharma company would still have to report on their clinical trails, contrary to what this false info is trying to spin.
the filing lists the class of security "0.250% Notes due 2022", that'll be some bond or preference share issue being withdrawn. not Pfizer.
you'd have learnt this by reading the responses to the tweet you got it from.

It's actually a post I saw on facebook.

Put the link into the search function on Twitter and got this.
https://mobile.twitter.com/search?q...25X02/primary_doc.xml#&src=typed_query&f=live

Here's a post that says it could be fake.
https://mobile.twitter.com/TeamAlpha3/status/1501668417740234754
 
Last edited:


beorhthelm

A. Virgo, Football Genius
Jul 21, 2003
36,014


Eric the meek

Fiveways Wilf
NSC Patron
Aug 24, 2020
7,091
OK guys time for some more feedback, since some of you may work in the City in stocks & shares, investments etc. maybe some feedback on what the link below actually means.


Happy to be ridiculed, hoping to get at least some usefull information.




https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/78003/000087666122000258/xslF25X02/primary_doc.xml#

I suppose it's possible Pfizer want to be listed on another exchange.

Do you understand what you are doing? You are searching for evidence to support what you already believe.

It's called confirmation bias.
 








colinz

Banned
Oct 17, 2010
862
Auckland
Do you understand what you are doing? You are searching for evidence to support what you already believe.

It's called confirmation bias.


No I'm testing evidence, when I come across this sort of stuff, I don't only post it in an echo chamber.
 
Last edited:


Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here