- Aug 7, 2003
- 8,093
Whatever tomfoolery Boris gets up to, he is infinitely preferable to Corbyn and any of his vile hangers on
Having said that can I nominste Pee-Wee Herman?
Having said that can I nominste Pee-Wee Herman?
Whatever tomfoolery Boris gets up to, he is infinitely preferable to Corbyn and any of his vile hangers on
Having said that can I nominste Pee-Wee Herman?
And the thing is in a time when so much is at stake politically he seizes on a matter as trivial as a woman's dress. It says it all really.
God help this country if he ever becomes PM. He'd take us from the Premier League to the Vauxhall Conference in one parliament.
Boris Johnson met with Steve Bannon recently, a true sign that he wants to be the British Trump.
Yesterday's bid for the xenophobic / racist vote demonstrated this. Attention seeking to keep himself in the news,
You think we’re in the Premier League?
have you read the article? is it actually racist, or was libertarian view with some poor, bloke-down-the-pub, wording? from what i've read its the latter (no sub to the Telegraph so cant read the original).
eitherway, he's shot any chance of leadership, if there was any chance at all
Barry Chuckle
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OK we will have to agree to disagree
But do you think Trump and Boris exhibit similar narcissist traits ?
He’s turned into our version of Trump, an arrogant untouchable air permeates his reckless day to day activity.
Oh dear. The mans not a buffoon, he's a nasty, dangerous individual. This comment was very carefully calibrated to offend some but principally to send a message to others so they think "He's alright that Boris bloke, straight talking and not afraid to speak his mind"
the irony is those offended have broadcast the message further and broader than it would have gone otherwise - it was in the Telegraph not the Sun after all. i'm not sure if you're giving him undue credit, did he really calculate all this?
the irony is those offended have broadcast the message further and broader than it would have gone otherwise - it was in the Telegraph not the Sun after all. i'm not sure if you're giving him undue credit, did he really calculate all this?