Weststander
Well-known member
Exactly.......lots of things to consider. For me it wasn't about health (hopefully), more about investment returns (I'm happy to take some risk), flexibility, tax management and being able to leave an inheritance. The DB scheme was good but current very high TVs made the decision easier.
Re fees for the advice, I think a fixed fee is probably fairest - loads of work involved for the IFA, and the amount of the potential pot doesn't really change the volume of work (so a % charge doesn't make sense). Any IFA would have to provide fee details in advance. Most will offer a free initial consultation to explain the options.
Thanks for the info.
Those agreeing to the IFA fee as a % of the funds transfer, face a widely varying array of percentage charges between facilitators/IFA's. Higher charges do not necessarily mean better advice and management.
I think clients should shop around with their own research, before committing with anyone. A larger % charge can have a huge adverse effect on the funds invested and future benefits.
This applies to both the initial charge on the transfer AND future annual management charges for running the SIPP investments.