Rehan Ahmed in at Number 3.... and smacks his first ball for four
Think they said it was Gooch and Atherton on TMS, vs SAI'm pretty sure it would be this one between Trescothick and Vaughan, in the 4th innings against Sri Lanka in 2002:
50 in exactly 5 overs, chasing 50 to win.ENG vs SL Cricket Scorecard, 3rd Test at Manchester, June 13 - 17, 2002
Get cricket scorecard of 3rd Test, ENG vs SL, Sri Lanka tour of England 2002 at Old Trafford, Manchester dated June 13 - 17, 2002.www.espncricinfo.com
Possibly, was running and not concentrating fully3rd fastest according to TMS
Score after 3 overs was higher than we’ve ever scored in a T20 international apparently
I stand corrected:Think they said it was Gooch and Atherton on TMS, vs SA
Somewhat left of left field thats for sure...This lot are utterly insane and I love it
Was I the only one who, at the time, thought Stokes was the wrong choice.An inspired choice of captain and coach for sure. Bringing the fun back to test cricket.
Rob 'Keysy' Key has done a quite superb job.An inspired choice of captain and coach for sure. Bringing the fun back to test cricket.
I was thinking that it could go 1 of 2 ways and fortunately its gone this way. The guy will go down in the history books of cricket for this and for all the other things that hes done for the game.Was I the only one who, at the time, thought Stokes was the wrong choice.
I wanted him to concentrate on his batting/bowling.
How wrong was I!
Nope, but given his break from the game and struggling a bit with the mental side, think it was natural to think that unless you were speaking to him directly.Was I the only one who, at the time, thought Stokes was the wrong choice.
I wanted him to concentrate on his batting/bowling.
How wrong was I!
Top top batsman. Treated terribly by England in 2016. Then the injury and the “drink” with Jimmy.Ben Duckett 50* (38 balls, 8 fours)
He has had a good tour.
The one thing I'd say from listening to them and the pundits talk about the way they play: it's not that they don't care about the consequences of the more apparently cavalier decisions, a lot of thought seems to go in behind the scenes around how to get the best out of the players and the tactics used.Nope, but given his break from the game and struggling a bit with the mental side, think it was natural to think that unless you were speaking to him directly.
I'm not sure I have seen a sporting transformation quite as successful as this one? Going into April I couldn't see how this England test side was going to turn it around. Couldn't open the batting, no tail, fragile middle order, bowling ineffective. It was a shambles. I didn't think there was enough talent to turn it around.
What has happened though is mindboggling. From Keys, to McCullum, to Stokes, to Root buying into it all, it's been miraculous. England have even turned a pitch not worthy of the name into a thrilling match. Sending the kid with a 5 for out to bat at 3 - they don't care, I love it.
What I meant by 'don't care' - was more about not caring about conventions or typical traditional ways of doing things. They completely care about winning games, making games exciting, playing great cricket. Agree with you, it's done with a steely focussed professionalism, but it's nurturing real freedom and confidence to have a go in the group.The one thing I'd say from listening to them and the pundits talk about the way they play: it's not that they don't care about the consequences of the more apparently cavalier decisions, a lot of thought seems to go in behind the scenes around how to get the best out of the players and the tactics used.