METALMICKY
Well-known member
- Jan 30, 2004
- 6,841
I notice that the press this week are full of stories from film industry insiders and Pierce Brosnan himself saying that the production of the latest film is in dissaray. Brosnan perversely doesn't know whether he's actually in it and is also critical of the over emphasis on special effects.
Am i the only person who thinks that in reality the Bond movies lost their way when they eventually ran out of the orginal Ian Flemming novels on which to base them? Action adventure/spy films etc are two a penny now and the slide into "seen it ,done it,been there" was inevitable. The original Flemming novels were great stories and although tweaked for the final film representations they provided a better foundation for decent films.
And whilst the debate continues i'll always plumb for Connery.
Am i the only person who thinks that in reality the Bond movies lost their way when they eventually ran out of the orginal Ian Flemming novels on which to base them? Action adventure/spy films etc are two a penny now and the slide into "seen it ,done it,been there" was inevitable. The original Flemming novels were great stories and although tweaked for the final film representations they provided a better foundation for decent films.
And whilst the debate continues i'll always plumb for Connery.