O/T. Identity Cards

[Harry Wilson's tackle]

does that make the Muslim killings more acceptable then
regards
DR

Ludicrous comment. The OP's point was about probability and risk. For a presumably second (at least, given your usual syntax) generation Englishperson, you seem to have serious difficulty grasping the nuances of the English language. I have read lots of your posts and, apart from the whimsical comments about jam and fishing, it sounds mostly like grunting to me. A second sentence is allowable, you realise? This isn't some sort of truncated twitterspace, where only a blurt is permitted

 

[JC Footy Genius]

That would depend on how you'd got rid of the other 50%

Convenient dodging of the question. If we had 50% less Muslims in Europe would the terrorist threat be more likely to increase or decrease?

 

[Harry Wilson's tackle]

I said perhaps. If Belgium, France and Europe as a whole had 50% less Muslims as a percentage of the population would the terrorist threat go up or down?

Stupid question. If we 'remove' (how?) all Muslims then terrorism would go down. The important question is: does the ends justify the means?

If anybody who 'threatens' me in word though or deed were 'removed'. I would by definition be safer, richer and more free.

Thanks for reminding me that there IS a Final Solution.

 

[JC Footy Genius]

Stupid question. If we 'remove' (how?) all Muslims then terrorism would go down. The important question is: does the ends justify the means?

If anybody who 'threatens' me in word though or deed were 'removed'. I would by definition be safer, richer and more free.

Thanks for reminding me that there IS a Final Solution.

I wasn't suggesting we remove anyone just highlighting the evident truth that the fewer delusional intolerant drones there are to manipulate the safer we would be.

Not sure how high the body count has to get before we are all on the same page.

 

[happypig]

Convenient dodging of the question. If we had 50% less Muslims in Europe would the terrorist threat be more likely to increase or decrease?

Not dodging the question at all. Part of the Islamists' rhetoric is the way "the west" has behaved towards Muslims over the past 100 or so years and, in particular, in Iraq & Afghanistan. It could be argued that they have a point, given the probably illegality of the Iraq war. After all, if "we" don't play by the rules why should they ?
Please note, I'm not condoning violence of any sort or from any quarter but to begin to understand the mindset of these murdering *******s we have to examine all the issues; people don't grow up and suddenly decide "right, time to hate some people", that hatred has to be nurtured and some Islamists have become quite adept at doing so.

 

[JC Footy Genius]

Not dodging the question at all. Part of the Islamists' rhetoric is the way "the west" has behaved towards Muslims over the past 100 or so years and, in particular, in Iraq & Afghanistan. It could be argued that they have a point, given the probably illegality of the Iraq war. After all, if "we" don't play by the rules why should they ?
Please note, I'm not condoning violence of any sort or from any quarter but to begin to understand the mindset of these murdering *******s we have to examine all the issues; people don't grow up and suddenly decide "right, time to hate some people", that hatred has to be nurtured and some Islamists have become quite adept at doing so.

Answer the question then .... if we had 50% less Muslims in Europe would the threat go up or down?

 

[Insel affe]

or spanish, english christians.. the Catholics supported mass murder in south america and did not say anything about the Nazi,s killing Jews

In the last century yes, remind me what century we are in now ?

 

[happypig]

Answer the question then .... if we had 50% less Muslims in Europe would the threat go up or down?

Up. Now prove me wrong.

 

[JC Footy Genius]

Up. Now prove me wrong.

Easy .. a minority are radical extremists intent on our destruction so the bigger the overall number of delusional followers the bigger the number who are likely to be extremists who condone killing you and people like you. Just because they mainly have different coloured skin or beards doesn't excuse their actions ... correct?

 

[happypig]

Easy .. a minority are radical extremists intent on our destruction so the bigger the overall number of delusional followers the bigger the number who are likely to be extremists who condone killing you and people like you. Just because they mainly have different coloured skin or beards doesn't excuse their actions ... correct?

That's only correct if those willing to pursue violence are a proportion rather than a fixed amount. what your question fails to address is that a hypothetical 50% reduction takes no account of where that 50% is drawn from. It's too simplistic to say "Less Muslims = Less Terrorists".
Around 4.5% of the country are Muslim, if you change that to 2.25%, you could well change the dynamics of Muslims' interactions and relationships with the other 97.75%, whether that radicalises more or less is unknown because you cannot predict the dynamic.

 

[atfc village]

Harold Shipman killed more people than Muslamic terrorist in the UK.
Anders Brevik killed more people than Muzlins too.

They weren't brown with funny beards though

MR Sutcliffe had a funny beard

 

[Paskman]

And we're ignoring the elephant in the room that is white, christian americans.

Shit! I lived in the States for 3 years, there were millions of the ****ers out there then, guess I was lucky to get back in once piece, I mean I socialised wither and went round to their houses - alone!- lots of time. Glad I have been warned, mustn't go back there in future. Am already avoiding, Muslim countries and friends......

 

[SeagullinExile]

Bollocks to ID cards. What after that? Micro chips?

I'd never be forced into having one

 

[Smirko]

One page and already descended into a binfest, NSC at it's best!