*NSFW* the truth hurts, camermoron..

[desprateseagull]

forgot to post this last week - as found on the tube&#0... on Twitpic

CAUTION- rude word ahead..

 

[Art Vs Science]

Whoever it was that defaced that Paper, he/she must be 9 yrs old. Honestly. Still.............He is a C u ** though

 

[Deleted User X18H]

What has he actually done I mean really? It really does highlight how very unintellectual some people are because he speaks with clear clipped English accent he must be despised. The fact the party the man leads has wrestled power of our poor country from the worst government in 250 yes 250 years seems inconsequential to some people.

You must remember the administration I am on about? You know the one that allowed the first run on an English bank since the mid 1800's that pumped money into every bank that they had allowed to continue wild overseas investment.

The administration who's fiscal policy was on par with Robby Box.

What is Cameron doing? Trying to rescue us all now and in the future from total and utter financial oblivion.

Stop the cuts? Stop the c*nts who marching.

 

[Art Vs Science]

Oh sorry, i think i have not made my position clear, they are ALL C****. I am not going to debate it, it is just my opinion.

 

[Westdene Seagull]

If that's the best the opponents of the current government can come up with then they are going to be in power for a very long time ( thankfully ) ! Probably highlights how poor Labours education policies were.

 

[Horses Arse]

What has he actually done I mean really? It really does highlight how very unintellectual some people are because he speaks with clear clipped English accent he must be despised. The fact the party the man leads has wrestled power of our poor country from the worst government in 250 yes 250 years seems inconsequential to some people.

You must remember the administration I am on about? You know the one that allowed the first run on an English bank since the mid 1800's that pumped money into every bank that they had allowed to continue wild overseas investment.

The administration who's fiscal policy was on par with Robby Box.

What is Cameron doing? Trying to rescue us all now and in the future from total and utter financial oblivion.

Stop the cuts? Stop the c*nts who marching.

Bloody he'll, is this a joke? It is the politics of the Tory party that have got us into this mess - free enterprise works MY ARSE.

Yes the last govt. were a huge disappointment but only because they were psuedo tories scared shitless of being labelled as the tax raising party. Meanwhile the party who have been soley responsible for a 15% increase ON EVERYTHING WE BUY are in power again; incredible really.

Bloody shame for our country that John Smith died.

 

[Herr Tubthumper]

The fact the party the man leads has wrestled power of our poor country from the worst government in 250 yes 250 years seems inconsequential to some people.

Wrestled power? He had to form a shabby coalition as he could not muster enough votes to beat a government which, by your own words, is the worst in 250 years. If I was a tory I'd be pretty concerned about this, as I know some of your party are.

 

[eggshell blonde]

And why should people expect to be looked after by the state at all? Scrap all benefits across the board and look back in awe as people suddenly become motivated, hard working and enterprising over night.

 

[JBizzle]

"Camermoron"?! I that the best you can do? Camoron would surely be better?

This issue is going to rumble on for ages. A colleague at work keeps grimly predicting "riots in the streets" and blaming Maggie, another thinks all Labour MP's should be fired.

Conversations between those two are certainly interesting...

 

[Rookie]

Cor better Cameron is really feeling the pressure with such witty and intellectual comments.

 

[Padders]

And why should people expect to be looked after by the state at all? Scrap all benefits across the board and look back in awe as people suddenly become motivated, hard working and enterprising over night.

Let's get building those 'Poor Houses'

 

[brakespear]

Bloody shame for our country that John Smith died.

This.

 

[brightonrock]

And why should people expect to be looked after by the state at all? Scrap all benefits across the board and look back in awe as people suddenly become motivated, hard working and enterprising over night.

Yeah, the disabled will leap out of their chairs and beg for a job down Asda, and unemployed graduates and those from lower income families who can't find work because EVERYTHING's getting cut, they'll magic work out of their own arseholes won't they. Benefits and helping out the less fortunate are what separate us from dictator-states, its the cheats and those that take advantage who need sending to the wall. Congratulations on making the most bigoted, idiotic and clueless statement on this thread.

 

[Billy the Fish]

Yeah, the disabled will leap out of their chairs and beg for a job down Asda, and unemployed graduates and those from lower income families who can't find work because EVERYTHING's getting cut, they'll magic work out of their own arseholes won't they. Benefits and helping out the less fortunate are what separate us from dictator-states, its the cheats and those that take advantage who need sending to the wall. Congratulations on making the most bigoted, idiotic and clueless statement on this thread.

It worked ok for the Victorians, one of the most advanced civilisations in the last 1000 years.

If some of those unemplyed graduates had a choice of earning money any way they could or starving to death I wonder which they would choose.

I'm not saying it should or could happen, but there is a perfectly logical argument for not having any state benefits.

 

[Barrel of Fun]

It worked ok for the Victorians, one of the most advanced civilisations in the last 1000 years.

If some of those unemplyed graduates had a choice of earning money any way they could or starving to death I wonder which they would choose.

I'm not saying it should or could happen, but there is a perfectly logical argument for not having any state benefits.

It was only advanced as it was at the end of the 1000 year period you mention. The Victorian era saw a huge increase in slums, overpopulation and child labour. Granted the country did move forward, but we were overly reliant on profit from our (criminal?) empire.

 

[Billy the Fish]

It was only advanced as it was at the end of the 1000 year period you mention. The Victorian era saw a huge increase in slums, overpopulation and child labour. Granted the country did move forward, but we were overly reliant on profit from our (criminal?) empire.

They were much more advanced than we are now. They managed to colonise half the world and put in place alot of the infastructure that we still use today.

The point I'm trying to make is the amount of innovation from that era quite possibly wouldn't happen if people were being kept on the breadline by the state like they are now, just enough to survive but too much to want to progress. You can see a similar thing going on in places like India today where they value hard work, any education they're lucky enough to get and innovative ways of making money. Interestingly they also have the same problems with slums, overpopultaion and slave/child labour.

 

[Barrel of Fun]

They were much more advanced than we are now. They managed to colonise half the world and put in place alot of the infastructure that we still use today.

The point I'm trying to make is the amount of innovation from that era quite possibly wouldn't happen if people were being kept on the breadline by the state like they are now, just enough to survive but too much to want to progress. You can see a similar thing going on in places like India today where they value hard work, any education they're lucky enough to get and innovative ways of making money. Interestingly they also have the same problems with slums, overpopultaion and slave/child labour.

Dirt cheap/slave labour is 'needed' to make swift advances?

They were certainly better at building. Longlevity of modern day buildings do not measure up to Victorian structures.

 

[sjamesb3466]

It worked ok for the Victorians, one of the most advanced civilisations in the last 1000 years.

If some of those unemplyed graduates had a choice of earning money any way they could or starving to death I wonder which they would choose.

I'm not saying it should or could happen, but there is a perfectly logical argument for not having any state benefits.

Bullshit. I'm sorry but the vast majority of graduates will do pretty much ANY job at the moment. For example, despite racking up £20k getting my degree I am still just working in a pub. I have applied for over 150 jobs in the last six months and only had one bloody interview so don't give me this shit that people like me are lazy and don't want to work.

My place of work is currently under threat of being shut and if I lose my job I think I deserve to get some help from the state as not only have I had a job constantly since I was 14 years old, was told at college because of government advise that 'If you get a degree you will walk into a £20k a year job so the debt is worth it', and quite simply I am a human being in a supposedly civilised country. Even though I work my ass off, full time, for £11k a year I happily pay into the tax system as I know that some of that money helps people worse off than myself. Granted, those who play the system are ***** but don't tell me I should be at risk of starving to death if by no fault of my own I lose my job.

 

[trueblue]

And why should people expect to be looked after by the state at all? Scrap all benefits across the board and look back in awe as people suddenly become motivated, hard working and enterprising over night.

Well, good luck with that if through no fault of your own you ever fall on hard times.

 

[sam86]

Camermoron is pathetic