Mine is based on the fact you cannot use these devices on an aircraft as there there is no evidence that passive smoking from these devices has not been proven to be safe.
Over to you.
Utter crap
Mine is based on the fact you cannot use these devices on an aircraft as there there is no evidence that passive smoking from these devices has not been proven to be safe.
Over to you.
The same place as the results of your research to blindly refute this statement.
That's not a problem with smoke breaks though. That's a problem with him and your boss, He was what we call round here a BELL CHEESE.He should have been sacked. If his superior wasn't dealing with it then he should have gone too.
The issue here isn't that lazy bar stewards should be allowed to have as many breaks as they want, It's that you should be allowed the basic human right to be a stupid whatsit in your own time, and that people should realise that as many deals are done in "breaks" as in the office.
But what is "your own time"? Is it specific periods during the day when you can stop working that have been written into your contract? Or is it sloping off on a regular basis because it's just become the norm and anyway, the bosses won't know where I am or what I'm up to?
Your own smoking break experience has provided you with some significant personal and work opportunities however, the overwhelming number of people on a fag break are not working in IT services or in a position to benefit from an opportunity to extend their contract through social networking; they're skiving off.
So no one ever goes on a break with their mate and discusses, say, a new tool they've found to help them or proposing a shift swap to help with a holiday or appointment or that they've heard redundancies might be in the offing? They just stand there skiving ALL the time, silently smoking while reading a paper? REALLY?
Wish us non-smokers got as many breaks as smokers at work!
You've said it yourself - and I quote, "there is no evidence". I'm sure ASH will claim there is, but they think that if someone lights up a hundred miles away we'll all die of cancer........ They're not called ASH (Anti Smoking Hysteria) for nothing.Mine is based on the fact you cannot use these devices on an aircraft as there there is no evidence that passive smoking from these devices has not been proven to be safe.
Over to you.
To say nothing of all the teachers in those schools.
This is about efficiency and productivity
10 mins a fag
10 fags a day
100 lost minutes
Yet paid the same as a non-smoker in the same role
Not fair?
I smoked from when I was 14 to when my son was born when I was a month shy of my 35th birthday. Nearly 21 years. In that time I made myself worse at every sport I played, got more coughs that I naturally should have and probably gave myself nasal polyps, resulting in 2 operations. I also met two of my best friends and my wife in the smoking room of my first company, met three invaluable work contacts on smoke breaks, had the funniest night I can remember in Dublin because I'd popped outside for a fag and did a deal that extended my timeline on a software project in Japan by two weeks because I took someone for a coffee and smoke at the right time.
My son was is now 8. I can run a half marathon fairly comfortably and have got up without coughing most mornings for about 5 years. Yet smoke breaks have been massively beneficial to my life as you can see from the above. The least people should be given is a choice.
And should non smokers also be allowed a non smokers break? Oh and sorry you forgot to add the usual drivel about more likely to be knocked down by a bus or something.
Smoking kills, as does passive smoking, the sooner it is completely banned the better.
OkBit of hysteria here again, I'm afraid. I know, it's what anti-smokers do - they can't help it. In the 20 - 25 years since smoking in the work place gradually became banned, I have never known any smoker to take ten fag breaks a day.