Gilliver's Travels
Peripatetic
Norman Baker has just asked the prime minister two questions:
1 When will he be visiting Lewes? [answer: at the earliest opportunity!]
2 Will he be raising the vital issue of climate change with Bush during his US visit tomorrow? [answer: Bush already knows where we stand and besides, it isn't his fault as such because the Senate voted Kyoto out years ago, by 100 to 1]
This all goes to show that if only Baker didn't have his ludicrous and unreasoning opposition to Falmer, he'd be in synch with popular feeling on most other important issues. Why oh why has he chosen to take such a stupid, career-damaging position?
1 When will he be visiting Lewes? [answer: at the earliest opportunity!]
2 Will he be raising the vital issue of climate change with Bush during his US visit tomorrow? [answer: Bush already knows where we stand and besides, it isn't his fault as such because the Senate voted Kyoto out years ago, by 100 to 1]
This all goes to show that if only Baker didn't have his ludicrous and unreasoning opposition to Falmer, he'd be in synch with popular feeling on most other important issues. Why oh why has he chosen to take such a stupid, career-damaging position?