They can recommend a review for a red card offense though, and this was serious foul play, unless you think an elbow to the face isn't endangering an opponent?If the ref missed it altogether - then VAR cannot tell the ref to give a free-kick, or a yellow card.
I fully agree with you.They can recommend a review for a red card offense though, and this was serious foul play, unless you think an elbow to the face isn't endangering an opponent?
Thanks for the clarification, that makes perfect sense.I fully agree with you.
I was answering the question that was asked: Was this actually reviewed by VAR? If so how is jumping into an opponent leading with your elbow into their face not even deemed a foul?
And I was pointing out that VAR wouldn't alert the ref to something if they considered it a 'mere' foul, or yellow card. Obviously they should have said 'come and have a look, it may have been a red card offence'. But even then, the ref may have said 'no thanks - I saw it'. Unless they release the transcript like for Liverpool, we'll never know.
So what do we do?
Having watched the replay, and seen the highest point of the elbow, I'm wondering if VAR let it go as he doesn't appear to connect to his face with the actual elbow (top of the chest). It's the only mitigation I can find.Blood on the face must have been an elbow?
if you watched the rugby World Cup, and respect the players have for the referee, the explanations in game etc and not think why or how can this not work in football, the Americans would love it, I can’t see any negatives to be honest.Be like rugby. Get people to ref who players respect. Get people in who know the game to do the reffing not low-lifes.
Explain the decision to the audience in real-time. I mean ffs - why don't they ever come on the TV and explain
themselves instead of playing the "we're too important to do that sort of sh*t"? No you're not. You're nothing.
Contact was originally his chin. It’s a red as he‘s leading with his elbow. A couple of inches higher and we could have been talking about a depressed fracture of the cheek.Having watched the replay, and seen the highest point of the elbow, I'm wondering if VAR let it go as he doesn't appear to connect to his face with the actual elbow (top of the chest). It's the only mitigation I can find.
He did a goal. That's wanker man's only frame of reference.Palinha is in Garth Crooks' Team of the Week despite Crooks highlighting the assault. You couldn't make it up.
Oh and it was against usHe did a goal. That's wanker man's only frame of reference.
Exactly this.Be like rugby. Get people to ref who players respect. Get people in who know the game to do the reffing not low-lifes.
Explain the decision to the audience in real-time. I mean ffs - why don't they ever come on the TV and explain
themselves instead of playing the "we're too important to do that sort of sh*t"? No you're not. You're nothing.
It’s have to be a very quiet day for BBC to show theseInteresting MotD didn't show any injuries or time wasting, not that they ever do.
Maybe consider you're comment.Be like rugby. Get people to ref who players respect. Get people in who know the game to do the reffing not low-lifes.
Explain the decision to the audience in real-time. I mean ffs - why don't they ever come on the TV and explain
themselves instead of playing the "we're too important to do that sort of sh*t"? No you're not. You're nothing.
It's pretty weird thinking about it. Seems like a job for life. You can consistently and persistently be bad at the job and not get sacked.It's no wonder the game is struggling for refs.