CaptainDaveUK
Well-known member
- Oct 18, 2010
- 1,537
I thought ref was fine but was "persuaded" by Rameirez into giving a red by showing him the injury.
Football is a game of opinions, don't need to use expletives to express mine.
well done you. but your ****ing opinion is ****ing wrong you ****ing ****. there you go. you can feel 4 times superior to me now. you ****.
Definite appeal against a bent ref....I mean a mistake on ill advise from a linesman and Ramirez
Congrats on abusing fellow fans
[/U][/B]
Fixed.
Winning the ball has nothing to do with if it is a red ir not. This was not a red though. Would not be suprised if boro are found to have bribed the ref.
Agreed ref was decent
You obviously didn't see the elbow from Knockeart which would have been a booking in most other circumstances. A second in this case.
Emotional specs off. I thought the referee was fine.
Thankyou
Do you not think he gave every possible foul to Boro and ignored several clear fouls on Brighton in the second half in particular? That's the way it seemed to me. The lino also gave a foul against Stephens in the first half for a good ball winning tackle. Not to mention failing to spot the offside on the Boro goal.
Thought that was an awful foul, to be fair and deserved a sending off.
Thus proving that you know **** all about anything. Stick to your 'what shape is your shit?' threads.
That's the way I saw it ..example Friend twice within seconds on Wilson..but what's done is done ..goal difference again!
Boro's third at the Amex is the only reason we aren't celebrating at the moment. It doesn't come any closer than that.