http://www.theargus.co.uk/sport/alb...urce=rss&utm_medium=Sendible&utm_campaign=RSS
Bang on for a change. Will the stats based approach change this summer?
Bang on for a change. Will the stats based approach change this summer?
Tony Bloom, Paul Barber and the rest of the board are bloody clueless when it comes to football. Don't worry, Tony Bloom reminded Martin Perry at the dinner awards that he's still got to build the £50m hotel before he retires.
It's plain to see that neither of them have any interest in football at all,Bloom is just using the Albion to increase a property portfolio,as for Barber,I'm ****ed if I know what his motive is.
If Bloom was only interested in property firstly why would you spend such a vast sum which is unlikely to yield a return and could easily have been put into property projects elsewhere for a much better return?and also So why does Bloom go to home AND AWAY games then? Especially by train where he is approached by fans?
How many games did someone like Bill Archer attend? - now there is a person who had no interest in football.
Prior to the three defeats to Fulham, Millwall and Derby, I was with the Board. But Hyypia failed to get it right when it really mattered.
I did not know that CH was waiting in the sidelines though as I thought getting a new Manager would be difficult.
His after match quotes did not help.
I never held with the wing-back system though. I have always held that three at the back is crazy.
There was no burning desire at boardroom level to remove Hyypia.
I've heard similar before, but then most chairman appear 100% behind a manager right up until the moment they sack him.
And when was that moment?