[Albion] missing thread?

[AZ Gull]

If that’s true why would you want to pay tax instead of players?

Albion will probably pay very little tax. There is a four-year window (one year prior and three year post) during which profits from player sales can be offset against new player purchases.

Further details from this recent Price of Football podcast:-

 

[dazzer6666]

Albion will probably pay very little tax. There is a four-year window (one year prior and three year post) during which profits from player sales can be offset against new player purchases.

Further details from this recent Price of Football pocast:-

View attachment 179783

Podcast ? Poocast ?

 

[AZ Gull]

Podcast ? Poocast ?

I'll leave that for the discerning listener to make their own judgement!

 

[Harry Wilson's tackle]

Ooh, I love an INTRIGUE!

Strictly speaking, intrigue does not require the indefinite article.

 

[peterward]

THIS is the bit we want all the details on, @Bozza!

"Can I speak to Darren please.......

Yes, whose calling............

Its Paul, Paul Barber from Brighton and Hove Albion............"

 

[Weststander]

Albion will probably pay very little tax. There is a four-year window (one year prior and three year post) during which profits from player sales can be offset against new player purchases.

Further details from this recent Price of Football podcast:-

View attachment 179783

In addition to that, the club have:

£102m of CT losses to offset against total profits including player gains; plus
£165m of CT losses to offset against future trade profits.

 

[dazzer6666]

In addition to that, the club have:

£102m of CT losses to offset against total profits including player gains; plus
£165m of CT losses to offset against future trade profits.

If only we had an owner who understood accounting

 

[AZ Gull]

In addition to that, the club have:

£102m of CT losses to offset against total profits including player gains; plus
£165m of CT losses to offset against future trade profits.

Have you listened to that podcast? The guy (who apparently advises Brentford) says that after a rule change in recent years, football clubs making more than 5 million pounds profit (I think that was the figure) will have to pay some level of tax, even if they have huge brought-forward losses.

Do you know anything about that?

 

[Justice]

Plenty of previous losses to offset the profit against.

It wouldn’t show a profit then would it? A turnover yes.

 

[Guinness Boy]

It wouldn’t show a profit then would it? A turnover yes.

Yes it would. Reports and figures are annual

 

[Me and my Monkey]

Strictly speaking, intrigue does not require the indefinite article.

Yes, but I think it sounds better thus, exploiting the elasticity of the English language.

 

[dazzer6666]

As I don't want to play games around this all night: no.

I have a whole range of google news email alerts set up and one of them came through with a link to an article on the club website about our annual accounts. I popped on here, no-one else had posted it so I quickly did the honours.

Then some stuff happened.

Na na na na na na, Bozza’s in the shit, in the shit, Bozza’s in the shit…..

 

[dazzer6666]

It wouldn’t show a profit then would it? A turnover yes.

I’d quit now if I were you.

 

[AZ Gull]

I’d quit now if I were you.

 

[The Andy Naylor Fan Club]

"Can I speak to Darren please.......

Yes, whose calling............

Its Paul, Paul Barber from Brighton and Hove Albion............"

Behave! Bozza was probably asked to remove the thread or suffer a 20,000 word email...

 

[Terry Butcher Tribute Act]

I hope the club haven't been dicks about it, but i do fear for whoever pressed upload too soon.

 

[Weststander]

Have you listened to that podcast? The guy (who apparently advises Brentford) says that after a rule change in recent years, football clubs making more than 5 million pounds profit (I think that was the figure) will have to pay some level of tax, even if they have huge brought-forward losses.

Do you know anything about that?

Hi. No I hadn’t listened to it, but have now. Thank you.

I see, for this industry alone, the CT losses rules have completely changed.

 

[Stat Brother]

...Darren it's Paul again on the phone...
...Take a message I'm still in the toilet from last time..
...Something about the missing thread - have you and your imaginary friends been silly, again?
...No, not this time they started it.
..Paul also says there had better not be a missing missing thread, thread.

...Yes dear
...Me or Paul?



...Does it even matter anymore.

 

[LamieRobertson]

Um, not quite how things work

I’ve tried and you are right …they wouldn’t wear it

 

[Harry Wilson's tackle]

Yes, but I think it sounds better thus, exploiting the elasticity of the English language.

Give me a hour to ponder this and I'll give it a consideration....indefinitely