aolstudios
Well-known member
Way beyond that, tbhWell, he (Corbyn that is) was going into full Michael Foot mode as a leader of the Labour Party heading for a catastrophic election defeat.
Way beyond that, tbhWell, he (Corbyn that is) was going into full Michael Foot mode as a leader of the Labour Party heading for a catastrophic election defeat.
It’s hard to know what to believe- I have also been thinking that there are similarities although in this case ‘Hamas leaders will be killed and weapons found’ for how else will the death of 4,000 children ever be ‘justified’? Finding ‘evidence‘ is Israel’s only defence to the charge of war crimes but ‘any‘ evidence is not enough …and what evidence is found, needs to be checked for its provenance imo.Are the tunnels under the hospital the new weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?
Odd they haven’t been found yet.
- ‘eliminating the terrorists’ is largely incontrovertible, it’s the mass killing of civilians that people have an issue with.
the innocent civilians that the terrorists are hiding among in their hospitals. The same terrorists that you agree need to be eliminated. You want Israel to play by international rules while Hamas doesn't agree to those international rules and YOU are giving them license to do that.
Children of Gaza who who have lost most of their family members in this war will be the next generation of “terrorists” imo.If it had been Britain brutally attacked by an old enemy in a surprise event in which innocent Brits were killed & their children forced to watch their parents murdered I think many would feel only one thing and that was to eliminate the terrorists and make Britain safe again. I know it is the way many, many Americans would feel.
You will find yourself on the wrong side of history my friend - support for Israel’s attack on Gaza is waning - and sympathy for the Palestinians is gaining global support and recognition of their plight.
This is absolutely the thing. Hamas doing what they did was disgusting and there are war crimes have no doubt. But Israels respose now is excessive to say the least and beyond supportable, with war crimes of their own openly now occuring.Both Israeli citizens and the civilians in Gaza deserve better than this.
I agree with everything you say above but on your definition of what Is inflammatory language - referring to what is happening in Gaza as ‘genocide’ maybe too early yet to prove- (those committing it in law need to be shown as having intention) but the policies Israel are pursuing is having a genocidal effect so the discussion needs to be had (and is being had) as to whether the Israeli response to the attack on 10/7 constitutes ‘genocide’.What doesn't help is the inflammatory language used by both sides, racism, apartheid, colonial genocide. This article is particularly chilling, drawing a correlation with the Tutsi genocide, rightly or wrongly:
Children of Gaza who who have lost most of their family members in this war will be the next generation of “terrorists” imo.
they get to join IDF instead.As I have explained before they don't have to be terrorists. Why aren't the Israeli children of the parents killed in front of those Israeli children expected to be terrorists? If the Gaza children actually abide by the international rules of war and realize peace is a better process I think then a two state solution can be worked out. But to expect the opposite reaction of what is expected of the Israeli children is not a proper way to think. They are all children dying and watching their parents die.
Quitethey get to join IDF instead.
They got little say in the matter. Most have to join the IDFthey get to join IDF instead.
As I have explained before they don't have to be terrorists. Why aren't the Israeli children of the parents killed in front of those Israeli children expected to be terrorists? If the Gaza children actually abide by the international rules of war and realize peace is a better process I think then a two state solution can be worked out. But to expect the opposite reaction of what is expected of the Israeli children is not a proper way to think. They are all children dying and watching their parents die.
Only for 18-24 months.They got little say in the matter. Most have to join the IDF
I’m not sure how you think the process of radicalisation works - and it’s not Gazan children parachuting into Israel or firing rockets but it is them being killed in the 1000s, being maimed or buried under rubble so what international rules of law are you suggesting they abide by?As I have explained before they don't have to be terrorists. Why aren't the Israeli children of the parents killed in front of those Israeli children expected to be terrorists? If the Gaza children actually abide by the international rules of war and realize peace is a better process I think then a two state solution can be worked out. But to expect the opposite reaction of what is expected of the Israeli children is not a proper way to think. They are all children dying and watching their parents dying