Yep, it looks like myself and several other users have been addressed in the comment section.Looks like @Live by the sea is besmirching NSC - https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/23863948.can-ceaseless-cycle-killing-israel-palestine-end/
Yep, it looks like myself and several other users have been addressed in the comment section.Looks like @Live by the sea is besmirching NSC - https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/23863948.can-ceaseless-cycle-killing-israel-palestine-end/
He said he has never had an account on NSC . . . Just a slightly unusual approach to punctuation (leaving a space before and after the comma) shared by two or three posters over the years.
How sad. Replying to himself!A style also favoured by Nick Wright on the Argus website apparently. Who would have thought there would be so many people making this mistake. They must all live by the sea or in a bushy.
Channel 4's assessment of the hospital bombing.
Channel 4's assessment of the hospital bombing.
Interesting mentality to label a number of people anti-Semitic in publicLooks like @Live by the sea is besmirching NSC - https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/23863948.can-ceaseless-cycle-killing-israel-palestine-end/
Equally shows those that accused him of having multiple accounts are right - hello @nick rhodes !
I just hope whoever did it didn't do it deliberately, and I'm not sure finding out who did it will help the current situation.So still as clear as mud.
Indeed, but if someone is confident that you were not the perpetrator you would think that they would not go out of the way not to purposefully manufacture or utilise fake material. On the assumption it was fake - it seems an odd strategy although saying that Israel has plenty of previous in this regard.Even if the conversation is faked, it still doesn't mean it wasn't a Gaza-launched missile gone wrong, and that does feel like the most likely explanation currently.
A security expert type was being interviewed on 5Live around 4:30 yesterday afternoon, and a point he made repeatedly was "Neither side have any interest in the truth on this", ie being seen by the world to be on the right side of this incident is the most critical thing to be achieved.
Sky News are reporting 60 killed in the West Bank in the last week, most of who were protesting outside IDF bases about the activities in Gaza.I do enjoy these threads because tend to learn more about an important subject. From what I understand Israel say the war is only against Hamas. I heard an interview who I admit seemed anti Israel saying over the years many have been killed in the Westbank where there are no Hamas. To those more knowledgeable Is this true and why
Interesting mentality to label a number of people anti-Semitic in public
If you look back over the thread he’s the one attacking people from the word go. He’s named all the people he’s had bust ups with and labelled them anti semitic strange behaviour to say the least.Interesting mentality to label a number of people anti-Semitic in public
The video on the BBC website shows a missile exploding in mid-air, either from a missile interception or an engine failure, then falling to earth and exploding on the ground. The BBC has geolocated the ground explosion to the hospital carpark (or thereabouts). This very strongly indicates that it was a Hamas rocket and that the ground explosion was the unused fuel. This corresponds to the scene in the carpark.So still as clear as mud.
Well, I see it like this…Indeed, but if someone is confident that you were not the perpetrator you would think that they would not go out of the way not to purposefully manufacture or utilise fake material. On the assumption it was fake - it seems an odd strategy although saying that Israel has plenty of previous in this regard.
This is an unfortunate and reprehensible tactic - unfortunately used spuriously but effectively against many left leaning Labour members over the last few yearsIf you look back over the thread he’s the one attacking people from the word go. He’s named all the people he’s had bust ups with and labelled them anti semitic strange behaviour to say the least.
That is what I got out of the BBC analysis as well. Channel 4 seems to be muddying the water more. Guess we will never really know the truth.The video on the BBC website shows a missile exploding in mid-air, either from a missile interception or an engine failure, then falling to earth and exploding on the ground. The abBC has geolocated the ground explosion to the hospital carpark (or thereabouts). This very strongly indicates that it was a Hamas rocket and that the ground explosion was the unused fuel. This corresponds to the scene in the carpark.
How can this be justified by when Israel say they are only after destroying Hamas and no Hamas in West BankSky News are reporting 60 killed in the West Bank in the last week, most of who were protesting outside IDF bases about the activities in Gaza.
Protesting? Or throwing rocks and petrol bombs? You can do an awful lot of damage with those. And many of the IDF will be seriously spooked teenage conscripts with minimal training. Not saying it's right at all, just saying the response is maybe understandableSky News are reporting 60 killed in the West Bank in the last week, most of who were protesting outside IDF bases about the activities in Gaza.
I do enjoy these threads because tend to learn more about an important subject. From what I understand Israel say the war is only against Hamas. I heard an interview who I admit seemed anti Israel saying over the years many have been killed in the Westbank where there are no Hamas. To those more knowledgeable Is this true and why
Fatah controls the West Bank, from a Palestinian standpoint, but Hamas does have a presence there.How can this be justified by when Israel say they are only after destroying Hamas and no Hamas in West Bank
This is a quite brilliant article written by a Brighton resident:
Mired in trivia, British political discourse is utterly unfit for times of war | Rafael Behr
Wise heads choose their words painstakingly and experts feel speechless, but here the void is filled with ignorant chatter, says Guardian columnist Rafael Behrwww.theguardian.com