Our first season since the first one at the Amex that we haven’t been involved in either relegation or promotion fights.
It’s great, isn’t it.
It’s great, isn’t it.
Our first season since the first one at the Amex that we haven’t been involved in either relegation or promotion fights.
It’s great, isn’t it.
Our first season since the first one at the Amex that we haven’t been involved in either relegation or promotion fights.
It’s great, isn’t it.
Perhaps next season we'll be in the Europa league chase?.....though could be back in relegation fight
Mid table maybe. Mediocrity definitely not. Some of our results outstanding, some of our football sublime.
Yes, not mid table mediocrity.
Mediocrity is completely the wrong word. "Mid table inconsistency" is more the description.
And we've probably only had 3 or 4 seasons in the last 30 years where it's not been seriously squeaky bum time at the end of April. So yes, this is nice. Also a little weird
I know "mid-table mediocrity" is the phrase, but I struggle to see our season as mediocre given our relatively small budget. We've actually improved every season under Potter which considering even Palace/Villa can afford to spaff £125k a week on players' wages, it some achievement
How do Palace manage to do that ? I can’t see their income matching ours. It can only be player sales presumably although I don’t really follow the comings and goings at the small teams.
If only there was a DULLARD who could answer that very question. For a start, though, don't we have an in-squad salary cap whereas they might have a few big earners and lots on smaller money? The thought being, in our favour, that squad morale is better without one or two really big earners in an average squad?
We might have bigger other outgoings as well. PB's salary, upkeep of the magnificent Amex / Lancing, top level women's team?
If mid table is mediocrity then what is bottom 6 ?
Palace haven't had their full accounts published yet - I expect Kieran will start bashing one out over them when they do