Beach Hut
Brighton Bhuna Boy
I truly cannot wait until [MENTION=38]Beach Hut[/MENTION] picks up on this. He will be 'paying' for his train travel 3 times
Oh dear, the Groovy Gang are back in force
I truly cannot wait until [MENTION=38]Beach Hut[/MENTION] picks up on this. He will be 'paying' for his train travel 3 times
before you get really pissed off, why not actually look at the pricing details first.
He's making a perfectly valid point.bore off
I've never known anyone to be so critical of the team as you. Yet [MENTION=4417]The Complete Badger[/MENTION] makes a perfectly reasonable point, that away fan numbers will probably reduce with a price hike of £10 and you complain about it.Do you ever stop moaning?
NO NO NO! i'm not getting 'really' pissed off here. the point i'm trying to make is A) football is generally expensive when you factor in a pie and a pint (which is optional I know but adds to the enjoyment) and B) individuals should be allowed to moan about the price of things these days without being put down by others that have more spare cash to spend. If you read my post it's (meant to be anyway) a comment about pricing/spare cash in general as opposed to a pop at the club
He's making a perfectly valid point.
I've never known anyone to be so critical of the team as you. Yet [MENTION=4417]The Complete Badger[/MENTION] makes a perfectly reasonable point, that away fan numbers will probably reduce with a price hike of £10 and you complain about it.
Having been to a fair number of away games last season, albeit not all of them, I think the only place I paid £32 was West Ham.
This decision might not have a particularly huge impact now, as the stadium is packed out with STHs. But once prices go up they NEVER come back down, and if anyone thinks we'll be getting remotely close to selling out The Amex after our first bad season they're actually mental.
In comparison to other forms of entertainment, it doesn't seem that bad to me. A comedian will charge £25+ these days. A seat at a West End show will set you back around £80.. Second tier prices usually about £60.
How much was a West Stand seat in 1997 at the Goldstone? I'm guessing about £20. I think it was £15 to stand so, given the facilities in the Amex, £32 FIFTEEN years later looks decent. And the message is clear enough - get a season ticket and save loads.
Sort of.
Having read up on it, the act of standing is not an offence - it's a breach of the licence. As the licence holder is the football club, it's they who are committing the offence.
I'm not a lawyer, of course, but that's the way I've read it.
NO NO NO! i'm not getting 'really' pissed off here. the point i'm trying to make is A) football is generally expensive when you factor in a pie and a pint (which is optional I know but adds to the enjoyment) and B) individuals should be allowed to moan about the price of things these days without being put down by others that have more spare cash to spend. If you read my post it's (meant to be anyway) a comment about pricing/spare cash in general as opposed to a pop at the club
Oh dear, the Groovy Gang are back in force
I took Danny Baker's explanation to mean that the club could challenge the licensing authority regarding this issue i.e. the club could say 'hey, we are going to put a terrace in.' and the licensing board will say 'no you cannot and if you do we will not get a license to hold matches' and then the club challenge this with 'but it's not the law and there is no good reason for you do this, see you in court.'
It was £8 for adults and £4 for kids in the north stand.How much was a West Stand seat in 1997 at the Goldstone? I'm guessing about £20. I think it was £15 to stand so, given the facilities in the Amex, £32 FIFTEEN years later looks decent. And the message is clear enough - get a season ticket and save loads.
Well, I guess they could. But with no guarantee of success - I'd imagine too many agencies and bodies would vehemently oppose the challenge - the moment anyone decides to do this, you can imagine the lawyers' faces light up, thinking 'great, let's order the Ferraris now...'
That opposition is a stance I strongly disagree with, of course; just speculating on how this would come to pass.
Well, I guess they could. But with no guarantee of success - I'd imagine too many agencies and bodies would vehemently oppose the challenge - the moment anyone decides to do this, you can imagine the lawyers' faces light up, thinking 'great, let's order the Ferraris now...'
That opposition is a stance I strongly disagree with, of course; just speculating on how this would come to pass.