Mr Putdown
Well-known member
Trespass is not illegal.
Some trespass is, where special statutory provision makes it so.
Trespass is not illegal.
Can you link it ?
I've seen the incident on video several times. There was some annoyance and dare I say anger showing on his face, but do I blame him for stopping her.....no. There were many senior people in the room, who knows what she was going to do, gun, knife, acid, milkshake?. If you are prepared to invade a private function with government ministers and other senior public officials present you should expect to be taken down.
Its a bit shocking the protesters got that far anyway what on earth was the security detail doing?
Some trespass is, where special statutory provision makes it so.
https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/trespass-and-nuisance-land
It directs criminal damage, hunt saboteurs, raves, squatting, using violence to gain entry etc I don't see anything that happened last night which is covered.
Some trespass is, where special statutory provision makes it so.
I've seen the incident on video several times. There was some annoyance and dare I say anger showing on his face, but do I blame him for stopping her.....no. There were many senior people in the room, who knows what she was going to do, gun, knife, acid, milkshake?. If you are prepared to invade a private function with government ministers and other senior public officials present you should expect to be taken down.
Its a bit shocking the protesters got that far anyway what on earth was the security detail doing?
Trespassing and heckling are not illegal.
Jim Davidson supports Mark Field's actions. That should be enough to make some apologists think again!
Section 68 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 provides for an offence of aggravated trespass, covering trespassers who engage in conduct intended to obstruct or disrupt lawful activity on that land or who intend to intimidate those taking part in that lawful activity.
Not sure how that fits with freedom to protest mind.
One sacked, one suspended and one given a disciplinary.
That's where reasonable force comes in. Mark Field did not use reasonable force.
who knows what she was going to do, gun, knife, acid, milkshake?
Can you link it ?
b) If he genuinely felt she was armed and a threat then he dealt with it poorly , you need to ensure person is immobilised and then disarmed. So you could say his action was an under reaction. personally think that her being armed has nothing to do with what he did.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-48718725
Watch the video on that page and you will see other protesters being ushered out without a single hand around a neck. I think someone was angry and decided to take the law into his own hands.
Their majority with the DUP is about to disappear so Johnson might not even get to be PM
Yes but this one was a maverick; a mad-eyed law unto herself fresh from the quagmire; an unquashable fiendess with something up that dress that spelt D-A-N-G-E-R. It was something in that saunter that said NECKBOMB!
I don't understand those who keep defending him when he has unreservedly apologised, admitting his guilt. He's not one of the Central Park 5.