Tricky Dicky
New member
So you're suggesting a not-for-profit rail franchise based on chaos?
You'd want two companies to provide a service from Brighton to Victoria, for example? To what end?
I didn't say not for profit - I'm quite happy with profits for shareholders if they are providing a service to warrant it, but not skimming off money to give to them before or above proving the service (less attractive to the shareholders, I know).
Not quite what you're chaos reference it pertaining to really, with respect to my comment.
Two companies on the same line, absolutely, to compete on service level if not prices. There is no true privatisation without competition, which is only currently present in the bidding process.