Butch Willykins
Well-known member
They are only testing hospital admissions.
Oh OK Mr Chief Coroner.
They are only testing hospital admissions.
Oh OK Mr Chief Coroner.
You are being very weird. It's pretty well known, and admitted by the government themselves, that they are only testing people who have been admitted to hospital. Look it up if you don't believe me. And maybe lay off the isolation beers a bit, eh?
You are being very weird. It's pretty well known, and admitted by the government themselves, that they are only testing people who have been admitted to hospital. Look it up if you don't believe me. And maybe lay off the isolation beers a bit, eh?
They are only currently testing those admitted. That doesn't mean it cant be picked up as a possible cause of death in those not admitted
If they die of pneumonia then they will likely be tested to see if corona virus was present. I would suggest if there are any pre mortem symptoms associated with corona then they'll either be tested or it will be recorded regardless as linked to covid-19.
Yes, of course they will. The suggestion otherwise is just so much nonsense. In many AIDS deaths, for example, the ultimate cause was pneumonia (which the body's AIDS ravaged immune system just couldn't fight) but they were still recorded as AIDS related.
Yup. In that case 'cause of death' as recorded on the death certificate would be 1A pneumonia 1B AIDS.
Agreed. That's a different point, though.
You were literally saying this wouldn’t happen a few posts back !
From Imperial College, this would be (relatively) great news, if it panned out that way:
View attachment 121560
But what happens then? This lockdown can’t last another 12 to 18 months whilst a vaccine is available for all those whose bodies hadn’t yet been infected and survived, can it?
Not to say it won't (hopefully) prove true, but I think this is flawed.
It's based on lockdown measures in China, which are far more stringent than the ones in England.
Our glorious leaders reiterated the 20,000 target today.
I feel bad casting aspersions on someone who's accumulated more knowledge in ten years than I could in 17 lifetimes, but the guy interviewed is an engineer, not a medical authority.
The theory is that by using social distancing, handwashing, changes in social behaviour and by testing, the number of infections is kept to a low enough level for the NHS to be able to cope with everyone with severe illness.From Imperial College, this would be (relatively) great news, if it panned out that way:
View attachment 121560
But what happens then? This lockdown can’t last another 12 to 18 months whilst a vaccine is available for all those whose bodies hadn’t yet been infected and survived, can it?
Not to say it won't (hopefully) prove true, but I think this is flawed.
It's based on lockdown measures in China, which are far more stringent than the ones in England.
Our glorious leaders reiterated the 20,000 target today.
I feel bad casting aspersions on someone who's accumulated more knowledge in ten years than I could in 17 lifetimes, but the guy interviewed is an engineer, not a medical authority.
Do the numbers (20,000 just now) come from our politicians, or from civil servant scientists and public health officials? I thought ministers simply relayed what the experts tell them on numbers.
Wow. 235 dead in a day in Switzerland. All of sudden they're the 5th worst affected in Europe.