I always read this sort of thing rather sceptically - I assume someone has a book to sell here. It could be true, but equally it's easy to say something dramatic that no-one can disprove.
Apparently the authorities wrote him off as dead in 1999 according to papers today.
I was always hoping he would eventually turn up again and reveal the true version of what happened to him after he killed the nanny.
Without wishing to sound like [MENTION=2850]brunswick[/MENTION] - I've always believed he was smuggled out of the country by his powerful mates and the authorities have always known where he was.
Apparently the authorities wrote him off as dead in 1999 according to papers today.
I was always hoping he would eventually turn up again and reveal the true version of what happened to him after he killed the nanny.
"After he was alleged to have killed the nanny" would be fairer. He has never been tried and his lawyers were not allowed to represent him at the coroners' court hearing at which the coroner pronounced him to be the killer. As a direct result of that, the law was changed and coroners no longer do that.