I do understand why you are clinging to this - so much was made of the fall of £ v $, as a tangible indicator of the scale of the government's folly, that you are highlighting the subsequent rebound as evidence to the contrary.
Gleefully doing so however, whilst ignoring the hike in interest rates, the additional £65BN it cost to settle the markets, and the increased cost in future government borrowing, is making you look a bit odd.
It is as though 'your' team made a catastrophic, entirely unforced error, at great cost to the country, and somehow you think its less embarrassing to make yourself look daft defending it, than to just admit they got it wrong.
It's akin to saying "well this building wasn't on fire a week ago and it isn't on fire now", ignoring the fact that in the week in between it caught fire, got heavily damaged in the fire and then the fire was put out by the fire brigade.