yes, if its potentially sensitive and not qualified with additional information. "if" something hadnt happend, something else might have happend is not facts. at least wait some time to verify and see what the real situation and outcomes are.
The gilts effect on everyone is getting exaggerated by all and sundry.
I did some online research earlier, it was hard to pinpoint exact numbers in 2022. But I established that c. 30% of public sector pensions were invested in all types of gilt, corporate bond and cash equivalents. Probably even lower in DB and private pensions. Public sector pensions are safe from all this anyway.
Some lay folk and stirrers are talking as if pension pots are being partially wiped out.
The rubbish non-real return on all gilts for a number of years has actually been a good thing, by accident. The old splits of e.g. 60% equities/40% bonds were long since abandoned. My friend with 7 figures managed by Cazenove's is 64, his pot before Kwarteng had 0% invested in gilts. The excellent manager had sold them all.
Yes, let’s ignore this constant erosion of our living standards, our international reputation and our economy. After all, in another five years this might all turn out to have been brilliant.
I confess that if the Kwarteng/Truss double act are still in power in 5 years time, we probably will look back on this as a sort of golden age.
Anyway, this road won’t lick itself clean…
Can we send Truss & Kwarteng to the tower yet ?
Mass insolvencies of pension funds? Surely that could only happen if a fund held all it's assets in gilts and it had to sell them to pay out the pensions but they now weren't worth enough to cover them all. That cannot possibly be right. What am I missing?
The gilts effect on everyone is getting exaggerated by all and sundry.
I did some online research earlier, it was hard to pinpoint exact numbers in 2022. But I established that c. 30% of public sector pensions were invested in all types of gilt, corporate bond and cash equivalents. Probably even lower in DB and private pensions. Public sector pensions are safe from all this anyway.
Some lay folk and stirrers are talking as if pension pots are being partially wiped out.
The rubbish non-real return on all gilts for a number of years has actually been a good thing, by accident. The old splits of e.g. 60% equities/40% bonds were long since abandoned. My friend with 7 figures managed by Cazenove's is 64, his pot before Kwarteng had 0% invested in gilts. The excellent manager had sold them all.
Mass insolvencies of pension funds? Surely that could only happen if a fund held all it's assets in gilts and it had to sell them to pay out the pensions but they now weren't worth enough to cover them all. That cannot possibly be right. What am I missing?
who said ignore? realtime feed of sensitive data can cause damage. nothing in the tweets about the issues you mention. maybe im just triggered because i remember Peston near causing a bank run because he wanted a scoop on BoE intervention before they were ready.
I'm just reading this: https://www.ft.com/content/038b30c3-f550-4cc0-93ed-9154021d6ee2
Think it explains the problem.
Thanks. Over my head. I'm out
Ha ha. Think I understood. basically boils down to "pension funds were fine until the gilts moved so far and so fast that they could no longer keep up with correcting their liabilities". So BoE had to step in to put the brakes on and give them room to sort themselves out.
Just imagine if we'd voted for chaos with Ed Milliband.