LamieRobertson
Not awoke
Van Dijk just paid his fee back.
Blimey 70 million to win a 3rd round tie....maybe the FA Cup still has appeal after all
Van Dijk just paid his fee back.
No, definitely not. He's prevented Lallana from running onto it, it's a clear and obvious foul. Great decision by the referee to play the advantage, and then to give the penalty when nothing came of it. Contact is fine, and if Lallana were holding it up, there's no foul. But he's spun Holgate and gone in behind, he's playing the ball if Holgate isn't holding him away from it. It's naive defending, Keown called it in commentary and there's an opinion to listen to when it comes to defending.
I thought the referee got that spot on, and then his handling of the flashpoint with Firmino and Holgate was spot on as well, strong refereeing and kept a lid on it without overreacting.
No, definitely not. He's prevented Lallana from running onto it, it's a clear and obvious foul. Great decision by the referee to play the advantage, and then to give the penalty when nothing came of it. Contact is fine, and if Lallana were holding it up, there's no foul. But he's spun Holgate and gone in behind, he's playing the ball if Holgate isn't holding him away from it. It's naive defending, Keown called it in commentary and there's an opinion to listen to when it comes to defending.
I thought the referee got that spot on, and then his handling of the flashpoint with Firmino and Holgate was spot on as well, strong refereeing and kept a lid on it without overreacting.
Blimey 70 million to win a 3rd round tie....maybe the FA Cup still has appeal after all
No, definitely not. He's prevented Lallana from running onto it, it's a clear and obvious foul. Great decision by the referee to play the advantage, and then to give the penalty when nothing came of it. Contact is fine, and if Lallana were holding it up, there's no foul. But he's spun Holgate and gone in behind, he's playing the ball if Holgate isn't holding him away from it. It's naive defending, Keown called it in commentary and there's an opinion to listen to when it comes to defending.
I thought the referee got that spot on, and then his handling of the flashpoint with Firmino and Holgate was spot on as well, strong refereeing and kept a lid on it without overreacting.
You're wrong - it was so obviously not a penalty that even Klopp himself admitted it wasn't a penalty. Watch it again - he hasn't prevented Lallana from doing anything. Lallana goes to the ground in a hopeful attempt to get a penalty and is rewarded.
And you don't think a forceful, intentional push from Holgate which makes Firmino go into the crowd warrants a card? I know you have some controversial opinions, but surely you must be fishing here.
Nothing controversial about it at all, especially if you consider the joke penalty Everton got against us, and then against Liverpool. The penalties being handed out at the moment are largely ridiculous, the one tonight was clear. I'm surprised there's a debate about it.
I didn't say I didn't think it was a booking, I said he handled the situation well. It's clearly a booking for me, totally unnecessary. But not giving the yellow doesn't mean he didn't handle it well.
Firmino could be in big trouble
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm no lip reader but it looked like he got called a 'puta'
No, definitely not. He's prevented Lallana from running onto it, it's a clear and obvious foul. Great decision by the referee to play the advantage, and then to give the penalty when nothing came of it. Contact is fine, and if Lallana were holding it up, there's no foul. But he's spun Holgate and gone in behind, he's playing the ball if Holgate isn't holding him away from it. It's naive defending, Keown called it in commentary and there's an opinion to listen to when it comes to defending.
I thought the referee got that spot on, and then his handling of the flashpoint with Firmino and Holgate was spot on as well, strong refereeing and kept a lid on it without overreacting.
Van Dijk just paid his fee back.
Back in 2012, they said they were going to start recording conversations between refs and players. Is that still going on? Could that provide some evidence?
I wonder how much the accusation affected the ref's decision? Holgate clearly grabs the ref and is upset by something, and he tells the ref. I think the ref found himself in a tough spot, the player absolutely should have been sent off, but had also made a claim of racist abuse. Can you imagine the stories "I told the ref about racist abuse and he sent me off!" If it's not recorded and the ref didn't hear or understand any racist abuse, he knows a player has reported it, can't back it up, and will be fairly sure that all the everton players will say they heard it, or they trust holgate; all the liverpool players will say they didn't hear anything or that Firmino isn't that type of player, so maybe nothing will come of it due to insufficient evidence, and the ref is made the villain in certain circles, and his reputation affected impacting his career.
Or perhaps the ref was just trying to to keep lid on everything, accepted the push wasn't particularly violent in and of itself (though the location made it worse), and the grab by Holgate wasn't out of dissent or malicious intent, and "tried to keep 22 men on the pitch". (No, I don't think that's his job, and I would agree Holgate should have got at least a yellow card, but I think the ref was in a tough position, 'damned if you don't damned if you do' sort of thing).