Tough luck all you arseholes who should have known better than to kick a club being run by tossers.
Liverpool will emerge bigger and stronger than ever.
Now watch Manure try to emulate what Liverpool have done......Again.
Count me in as an arsehole then, as I for one couldn't give a flying fook who owns Liverpool nor what they do with the club. Utterly bored of the whole saga.
Because I'm an Albion fan and this is an Albion forum.
Count me in as an arsehole then, as I for one couldn't give a flying fook who owns Liverpool nor what they do with the club. Utterly bored of the whole saga.
Because I'm an Albion fan and this is an Albion forum.
Count me in as an arsehole then, as I for one couldn't give a flying fook who owns Liverpool nor what they do with the club. Utterly bored of the whole saga.
Because I'm an Albion fan and this is an Albion forum.
But the team will be well run. The NESV are businessmen who happen to own sports teams.
...
Cheap? Sometimes. Better than foolish, though....
Count me in as an arsehole then, as I for one couldn't give a flying fook who owns Liverpool nor what they do with the club. Utterly bored of the whole saga.
Because I'm an Albion fan and this is an Albion forum.
The fans will pay more, and in some cases, a lot more. (You'll need a mortgage officer standing by to buy a pint.)
But the team will be well run. The NESV are businessmen who happen to own sports teams.
Based on Boston experience, if the Reds go The NESV Way:
-- They will not overpay for talent, especially aged talent -- they'll let it walk first. (Hi, Mr. Gerrard ) The Sox have lost players to free agency because they've offered three-year deals when the player's wanted four, let fans weep though they may.
-- They will not go into the transfer market as a first resort -- expect an emphasis on the home-grown product. The Sox have developed home-grown MVP-level talent.
-- When they do go in they will pay based on what a player can expect to, and not what they've already done. Poaching aging stars for a quick fix is definitely not on. And they will go anywhere to find talent. Sometimes that's been a mixed bag (Daisuke Matsuzaka).... LFC are likely to be full to the gunwales with players you've never heard of in ten month's time.
Cheap? Sometimes. Better than foolish, though....
(Been a Reds fan since the early '80's and a Red Sox fan since the womb. I am happy.)
Based on Boston experience, if the Reds go The NESV Way:
-- They will not overpay for talent, especially aged talent -- they'll let it walk first. (Hi, Mr. Gerrard ) The Sox have lost players to free agency because they've offered three-year deals when the player's wanted four, let fans weep though they may.
-- They will not go into the transfer market as a first resort -- expect an emphasis on the home-grown product. The Sox have developed home-grown MVP-level talent.
-- When they do go in they will pay based on what a player can expect to, and not what they've already done. Poaching aging stars for a quick fix is definitely not on. And they will go anywhere to find talent. Sometimes that's been a mixed bag (Daisuke Matsuzaka).... LFC are likely to be full to the gunwales with players you've never heard of in ten month's time.
Cheap? Sometimes. Better than foolish, though....
(Been a Reds fan since the early '80's and a Red Sox fan since the womb. I am happy.)