Leekbrookgull
Well-known member
Love him or hate him? Does seem to speak his mind.
Littlejohn,today
- Thread starter Leekbrookgull
- Start date
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Leekbrookgull
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #4
Take it,Seagully you dont like him?
robbobhafc
Active member
Re: Re: Littlejohn,today
sounds like the taxi driver from football factory only a scouser
Buzzer said:
sounds like the taxi driver from football factory only a scouser
Leekbrookgull
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #8
So,Seagully,you follow, Sir Arthur?
clapham_gull
Legacy Fan
- Aug 20, 2003
- 25,883
He's a complete twat and if you stick him in a situation against people who know what they are talking about, he is quickly shown up to be the complete arse he is.
He writes to a formula and fools lap it up.
He writes to a formula and fools lap it up.
cannedheat
Banned
I dont like him but a lot of people read it.
looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
But when you ask lefties what was so offensive or to "the right of hitler" lefties clam up or hurl more insults.
99% of people who post about politics on a football forum like this do so because they wouldn't last long on a more focused political site, they would be eaten alive(and probably banned).
Meet the 1%.
99% of people who post about politics on a football forum like this do so because they wouldn't last long on a more focused political site, they would be eaten alive(and probably banned).
Meet the 1%.
cannedheat said:
The same can be said of Jeffery Archer, but he is a twat too
looney said:But when you ask lefties what was so offensive or to "the right of hitler" lefties clam up or hurl more insults.
99% of people who post about politics on a football forum like this do so because they wouldn't last long on a more focused political site, they would be eaten alive(and probably banned).
Meet the 1%.
How dare you you absolute
Billy the Fish
Technocrat
He's very hit and miss. He talks alot of sense sometimes, and then screws it all up by going totally over the top. He seems to wind up most people that post on here in much the same way that clarkson does, so in that sense, he's fine by me 
cannedheat
Banned
I don't want to go on a more focused political site, cos gezzer it would be swarming with boring turds innit.
Buzzer
Languidly Clinical
- Oct 1, 2006
- 26,121
looney said:But when you ask lefties what was so offensive or to "the right of hitler" lefties clam up or hurl more insults.
99% of people who post about politics on a football forum like this do so because they wouldn't last long on a more focused political site, they would be eaten alive(and probably banned).
Meet the 1%.
Strictly speaking, if you carry on to the right of Hitler, you'll go full circle into Stalinist and North Korean socialism. It's why so many of those on the extremes of political views flit from extreme left to right and vice versa.
I've been reading back some of your threads and I don't think you're as politically clued up as you think you are.
And before you accuse me of being a left-winger, my politics are firmly based in the laissez-faire economics of Von Hayek, Friedman, Alexis De Tocqueville and Karl Popper.
looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
Karl Popper wasn't an Economist. In fact only one of those was around when lasseir fair was a political creed.
Laissez faire economics - An economic theory, first propounded in the 18th century by Adam Smith, that held that individuals should be allowed to pursue their own interests, with as little government interference as possible. Property rights were sacred, landlords and employers were to be given almost complete control over tenants and workers. (Sound familiar?) The prosperity of 19th century England is said to be grounded in laissez faire capitalism.
http://www.sff.net/people/gunn/dd/l.htm
So you blend in derogatory leftwing terms with rightwing thinkers? OK
Laissez-faire (imperative) is distinct from laisser faire (infinitive), which refers to a careless attitude in the application of a policy, implying a lack of consideration, or thought.
http://dictionary.laborlawtalk.com/Laissez-faire
Well done for using the right one but try not to import 19th century french into 20th century Economics. It has no relavent relation to the thinkers you mentioned.
Also the political spectrum is quite often seen as an axis not a circle.
Laissez faire economics - An economic theory, first propounded in the 18th century by Adam Smith, that held that individuals should be allowed to pursue their own interests, with as little government interference as possible. Property rights were sacred, landlords and employers were to be given almost complete control over tenants and workers. (Sound familiar?) The prosperity of 19th century England is said to be grounded in laissez faire capitalism.
http://www.sff.net/people/gunn/dd/l.htm
So you blend in derogatory leftwing terms with rightwing thinkers? OK
Laissez-faire (imperative) is distinct from laisser faire (infinitive), which refers to a careless attitude in the application of a policy, implying a lack of consideration, or thought.
http://dictionary.laborlawtalk.com/Laissez-faire
Well done for using the right one but try not to import 19th century french into 20th century Economics. It has no relavent relation to the thinkers you mentioned.
Also the political spectrum is quite often seen as an axis not a circle.
London Irish
Well-known member
keaton said:
