I'd prefer if last season was his last season as a 1st choice player.Personally I think this should be Greer's last season as a 1st choice player
I'd prefer if last season was his last season as a 1st choice player.Personally I think this should be Greer's last season as a 1st choice player
In today's Argus, CH says he still wants to sign a LeftBack, so Rosenior wasn't our signing for this position.
I'd prefer if last season was his last season as a 1st choice player.
In today's Argus, CH says he still wants to sign a LeftBack, so Rosenior wasn't our signing for this position.
I noticed that too, seems like the wheels are in motion with.that one.also interesting that CH says he wants another forward - doesn't mention COG so looks like he is not part of our plans.
also interesting that CH says he wants another forward - doesn't mention COG so looks like he is not part of our plans.
That's putting your spin on it. My spin says that I'd expect Bruno to play the majority of games at right-back, and Rosenior at left-back. We could always sign another left-back for cover, and then wave bye-bye to Chicksen.
I've not read the piece but my assumption is that he mentions Balders & Clunge then?
Baldock yes Colunga no. I get the impression that CH is looking at at Hedem/Baldock two up front with Baldock dropping back if need be.
That's putting your spin on it. My spin says that I'd expect Bruno to play the majority of games at right-back, and Rosenior at left-back. We could always sign another left-back for cover, and then wave bye-bye to Chicksen.
Rosenior said: “I am right-footed so I would say right-back but it is a strange one as I am just as comfortable at left-back. I use my right foot a lot at left-back but I am quite effective in that way. I will happily play anywhere the manager needs me to play and do a job for the team.
I believe Murphy could play as a 2nd striker ( as well as being a winger ) **if we get him**
Good point. Maybe the new left back will be intended to be first choice in 2016/17, with Rosenior starting as left back for us, then moving to right back in a year's time
That's what I thought but I'm not so sure know with CH's comments today.
I've also just read this from yesterday's Argus: