At what capacity? He’s not ready to be our manager just yet.Easy to criticise clubs for sacking managers. We’ve received it. But I’d take Liam back at the Amex.
Based on what out of interest ?Better than Hull.
Sums it up nicely for me, many of the players that got us promoted were bought in by Liam - Given that we had a squad of 5 and under strict embargo when he took the interim job, he did well. (Owner) Clowes felt that at the time, the job would be too much pressure for a rookie manager, I think he was probably right. I think he's been unlucky at Hull, reasonably well backed but was coming from a low base.Based on what? He did a good job at Derby but understandably was replaced by a more experienced manager. And then also did a good job at Hull turning them around and getting them to within reach of the playoffs.
It can but Hull were barely outside of the relegation zone just before took over and he led them to their highest championship finish in 8 years - I think we've all learned that continuity is a good thing down there!3 wins and 16 points in last 13 matches has done for him, particularly a 6 game winless run, and after expectations raised with an 8th place finish the season before.
Derby got rid too. Rightly or wrongly, questions will be asked about Rosenior's toughness.
Thr Championship can be brutal.
Never can tell with wages on loans, but they got a few really good loans in from the PL, doubt this was cheapLR did extremely well considering their budget.
I hope he gets another opportunity soon.
Delap, Carvalho, Traore, Giles, Morton, Connolly 1 year deal won’t have been cheap. Philogene & Tufan also extremely good players for that levelNever can tell with wages on loans, but they got a few really good loans in from the PL, doubt this was cheap
Also, Hughton had arguably done the job he was brought in to do – get the team promoted to the PL – after a tough few seasons (coming back to my point above about the longevity of managers). As you say, it was clear that things were only go in one direction and the right decision (in hindsight!) was made to get rid in that instance. With Rosenior, very possible not.To all those being careful not to criticise Hull for sacking their manager before comparing it to Hughton's sacking down here, I'll say this:
In times like this it's always a good idea to check out what the fans think. With Hughton, there were those of us who thought it was shocking, but it was clear that most of us realised his time was up after 6 months of defensive dross that didn't work well. Compare that to the Hull message board (or that of Birmingham's after Rowett and then Eustace got sacked): near universal condemnation.
Based on the response of their fans, they'll only have themselves to blame if they find themselves down the table next season.
not only this but sometimes with such little experience. Would any other industry give top jobs at big companies with next to no, or sometimes even no, experience? Think Lampard, Gerrard etc.Is there another industry where bosses are routinely sacked and replaced after such short periods on such a regular basis?
Lampard was given the Chelsea job FFS. A bit like giving the keys for a Ferrari* to a 17 year old.not only this but sometimes with such little experience. Would any other industry give top jobs at big companies with next to no, or sometimes even no, experience? Think Lampard, Gerrard etc.
Lampard was given the Chelsea job FFS. A bit like giving the keys for a Ferrari* to a 17 year old.
*A mustard yellow one, with bling and modified loud exhaust - so basically souped up by a tasteless chav.