Cian
Well-known member
You can change tack all you want. You said that report was a thesis - its not; on sexual health and alcohol - its not; that it was by one research assistant - its not.
You were wrong, simple as. Think being wrong on all three things you mentioned comprises being a dunce, doesn't it?
You can say I didn't read the introduction (true - I read the introduction of Part 1 about three months ago when it was released), but its clear that thats about ALL you read. Quickly, at that.
You were wrong, simple as. Think being wrong on all three things you mentioned comprises being a dunce, doesn't it?
You can say I didn't read the introduction (true - I read the introduction of Part 1 about three months ago when it was released), but its clear that thats about ALL you read. Quickly, at that.