A pat on the arse is generally a sign of accepting what the ref said and moving on.
I think he got booked for what he said to the ref after being pulled up for a foul. He had a point and yes, he did pat the ref's arse afterwards.
Good stand in for Bridcutt against the better sides in the division. I don't think he's necessary all of the time as he doesn't offer much going forward. Crofts, Ince and Agustein can all do their bit defensively and still offer a great amount going forward.
Andrews is a very clever and very experienced midfielder, if you watch him he's constantly in the referees ear and uses his experience to influence the officials as best as he can.
More importantly he puts himself about, always wants the ball, works hard and looks composed.
I would personally say an all round better player than Bridcutt.
Absolutely. The issue now though is how we replace Crofts, not Bridcutt. I've been saying for some time that Andrews will fill the Bridcutt gap. Crofts is not so clear.
Did see that, bit odd. Just assumed it was dissent, and him saying sorry
After conceding a foul and getting booked he patted the ref on the arse. Unnecessary and could have ended up in a second booking from some referees. But had a great game yesterday. A ready made Bridcutt replacement!
A pat on the arse is generally a sign of accepting what the ref said and moving on.
A pat on the arse is generally a sign of accepting what the ref said and moving on.
Bit short of the extra midfield terrier that we need against the better sides now that Crofts is out. Barnes could usually be relied on to mix it up a bit too.