Keith Andrew

[Springal]

Still on loan at Watford, but in garden leave due to something that's happened. Fans not happy as he had been good for them this season and a leader. Likely to want a new loan deal, or permanent signing. I'd take him back. Very under rated much like Hammond for us in my opinion. Too many of our fans expected a team of flairistas and under rated the grafters in my opinion

 

[BensGrandad]

I would take him back on loan.

 

[scooter1]

Being as we've taken a giant leap backwards this season, I'd be happy for him to come back and add a little solidity to our midfield. Loan til the end of the season, or even perhaps an 18 month deal as a permanent player.

 

[supaseagull]

No thanks

 

[We're the Stripes]

As an experienced head who could come off the bench to help sure things up in midfield in certain games, as well as help guide some of the younger players (a la Kish), yeah sure, why not?

As a regular starter? Hmm, not so keen.

 

[Captain Sensible]

I'd rather a fit again Stephens

 

[London Irish]

Like him a lot as a football personality and enjoyed many of his performances for RoI - but the legs have definitely slowed a little too much for me

 

[OvingdeanSeagull]

I thought he was awful. He was one of the main reasons why our games were so boring that season. Would be genuinely gutted if we re-signed him.

 

[HantsSeagull]

not sure whats gone on a watford but i have an abiding memory of him fighting with the goalkeeper coach we had last season before the play off semi against Derby - i get the feeling he may have a bit of a temper

 

[stss30]

Provided underrated defensive solidity especially in tough away games. I would definitely have him back. Not a regular starter though and could be on a fair whack.

 

[severnside gull]

Officially it's because he is the sixth loanee but interestingly the manager commented that he couldn't communicate either way. Oscar was happy to have him at Watford straight away and if he is a big character off the pitch it's surely just a test of man management. He is certainly a big voice on the pitch and we have missed that. On balance I think I would have him back until the end of the season when his contract with Bolton is up anyway. If he was offered though I'd expect Hughton to turn to Greer for definitive advice.

 

[HantsSeagull]

Officially it's because he is the sixth loanee but interestingly the manager commented that he couldn't communicate either way. Oscar was happy to have him at Watford straight away and if he is a big character off the pitch it's surely just a test of man management. He is certainly a big voice on the pitch and we have missed that. On balance I think I would have him back until the end of the season when his contract with Bolton is up anyway. If he was offered though I'd expect Hughton to turn to Greer for definitive advice.

NJ first surely?

 

[durrington gull]

No thanks

Agree - a step backwards getting him back - did nothing apart from pass sideways and back

 

[severnside gull]

NJ first surely?

Probably right of course. Just thinking that relations with the coaching staff aren't always the same as those with fellow players and views on colleagues on the pitch aren't always shared with the gaffers.

 

[perseus]

I thought he was good enough to replace Bridcutt. The only thing against him is his age. I could really not see anything wrong with his play at Championship level. Defensive midfielder only and not the playmaker type, more the defender type.

 

[Hampster Gull]

Nothing to see here, move along

 

[Notters]

Definitely not what we need, imo. Think we need someone big and strong, he's too much like what we have already.

 

[8ace]

Agree - a step backwards getting him back - did nothing apart from pass sideways and back

Never tackled anyone either.

 

[mikevapour]

By far our worst player last season!

 

[durrington gull]

Never tackled anyone either.

Agree - massive mistake getting him back- dreadful