Well, out of the many debates I've seen, there currently isn't one unfortunately. Which is why she's calling for one.
Feel free to give her one.
Well, out of the many debates I've seen, there currently isn't one unfortunately. Which is why she's calling for one.
I find it totally implausible that she just meant that she would like us to find a solution to the problem. Read her tweets, understand her language, and you'll know what she meant. We'd all like a solution to the problem, but none of us would write that we need a final solution - not because we know what it means (I'm sure many don't), but because it's not the way we write standard English. And Katie would have definitely known what it meant.I really think that is what she meant.
While her post does say they should all be killed, I don't think it's really what she wants, I just think she wants to be provocative.I don't believe she is calling for mass killings.
If she's forced to respond, I wouldn't be surprised if the response is made up by her lawyers.Has she had any interviews on this yet? Would like to see her repsonse.
Someone hasn't been watching enough of Paul Joseph Watson.
Using genocidal language is indefensible. This has NOTHING to do with free speech, has she been arrested?
HAHAHA
Now I know that you're an idiot.
Morel likely to be The Ken and Katie show perhaps?
How Livingstone is allowed to remain in the Labour party is beyond me.
Stop embarrassing yourself
PJW is a ****ing TWERP. He is a paranoid racist lunatic that very rarely leaves his mum's house. He changed his twitter profile pic to a picture of him smoking, BECAUSE HE SAID IT MADE HIM LOOK COOL.
He is a ****ing WASTEMAN.
The people that follow him are all IDIOTS.
So you watched all of his videos then?
[tweet]737367214148456448[/tweet]
The man is a tool.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EkEbge169s
/QUOTE]
Ashamed to say I watched that all the way through and actually enjoyed it on some perverse level. I feel dirty now.
[tweet]737367214148456448[/tweet]
The man is a tool.
He would get the absolute cr*p kicked out of him if he said stuff to peoples faces. Like most trolls
isnt it? just to be clear, are all instances of "final solution" to be banned, because i need to redo some documentation if that's the case.
I find it totally implausible that she just meant that she would like us to find a solution to the problem. Read her tweets, understand her language, and you'll know what she meant. We'd all like a solution to the problem, but none of us would write that we need a final solution - not because we know what it means (I'm sure many don't), but because it's not the way we write standard English. And Katie would have definitely known what it meant.
While her post does say they should all be killed, I don't think it's really what she wants, I just think she wants to be provocative.
If she's forced to respond, I wouldn't be surprised if the response is made up by her lawyers.
Coming from you?! Wow, that really is bad. I feel stupid now.