Those who are ITK will know
It wasn't intended for bobble hatters or Toby's
You mean you can't answer, even though you know what I'm getting at.
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
just a reminder
- Thread starter Pretty pink fairy
- Start date
You mean you can't answer, even though you know what I'm getting at.
- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,791
I think it unlikely that CH (a man who has a history of writing articles for socialist publications) would get involved in a protest group who's organisers have a history of football violence and right wing political groups - clearer ?
I think we can both agree that Chris was not going to the march and was just photographed on a train.
I'm not interested in politics but I'm against terrorism, this is what the march was about, I'm sure there were plenty on the march that are not right wing.
My point is, I'm sure CH is also against terrorism whatever his political views are.
I'm not sure why you mentioned them, nothing too see here.
Last edited:
- Jul 10, 2003
- 27,791
You, me and Chris. Agree nothing to see
Whoever sent the tweet has misled a few people though.
Tweet should have said, " CH chats with Newcastle fans on train, decent bloke "
nicko31
Well-known member
The sad reality is there are a lot of people that will take taken in by this fake news.
The Wookiee
Back From The Dead
Associated with who ?
Sorry but Socialist worker
I know [emoji23][emoji23]
daveybgtt
New member
I was prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt, but this line
He called for “hate preachers” to be “arrested”
Has gone too far IMHO (in my honest opinion)
That is hands down the most hateful, RACIST comment I have ever read, I spat my tea over my macbook pro. I shall have NO INTERACTION with the FLA or any thread that dares speak their name. LITERALLY SHAKING RIGHT NOW!!!
He called for “hate preachers” to be “arrested”
Has gone too far IMHO (in my honest opinion)
That is hands down the most hateful, RACIST comment I have ever read, I spat my tea over my macbook pro. I shall have NO INTERACTION with the FLA or any thread that dares speak their name. LITERALLY SHAKING RIGHT NOW!!!
looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
Says a Watford O parody account.
looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
Are those Wolves chaps who were throwing scaffolding at an Albion pub going to be walking side by side with those same Albion fans then? Impressive stuff. It's a bit like that He Man episode where He Man and Skeletor are on the same side and He Man says "Skeletor might be a villain but he's OUR villain".
It's triffic that all these thick-necked crew-cutted simpletons can unite around a common cause - all against those ruddy EXTREMISTS. And when this march is all done, the extremists will cower away, and the whole nation - if not the world - will have changed forever. And it's all thanks to these lads marching instead of smashing up each other's pubs.
Typical crass post from you Dumpster They are more likely, making contacts, swapping details and organising because they know whats coming.
With annual growth rates in jihadi attacks of around 400% how long do you think youve got?
- Apr 5, 2014
- 25,979
They already are.
pastafarian
Well-known member
Just how out of touch do these trot idiots at the SWP have to be?
From the article you are no doubt fawning over
“The EDL started with similar racist appeals about “Islamic extremism” and used sections of organised football supporters.”
Taking the appealing to football supporters out of the equation what sort of idiot thinks opposing Islamic extremism is racist…….oh that’s right a SWP apologist idiot.
McTavish
Well-known member
- Nov 5, 2014
- 1,589
Do you have a source for that figure?
What are you talking about, Lunatic old boy? Maybe you should keep your incoherent dribble to threads about how we need more guns in this country. [emoji38]
Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
I did see a graph based on the last few years in a FB group, If I find it Ill post it as Im getting data thats to broad on searhes, turn it around though, do you doubt those numbers?
I'll just leave this here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_death_rate
Here's the bit that you'll make excuses for:
Firearm deaths per 100,000:
United Kingdom 0.23 (2011)
United States 10.54 (2014)
It seems you're 46 times more likely to die of a firearm related incident in the US than you are here. Sorry, what was that you were saying about safety?
looney
Banned
- Jul 7, 2003
- 15,652
You going to top those numbers up with acid attacks? /Anyway, you overlook the point that the USA is saturated with guns so any ban would lead to law abiding citizens being put at the mercy of criminals.
You also do not see any "safety" advocates offering up control as a final settlement, on a lot of issues this type of mission creep/progressive politics does not work, especially when the opposite is cast in stone,. For example, the progressive abolition of the monarchy? The NRA is always ready to negotiate wereas the GOA isn't, most Americans who are pro gun take their cue from the GOA.