Joao Carlos Teixeira

[Lindfield23]

Sounds like a good option to me - so long as he doesn't do a u-turn on the M25 on the day of his contract signing

 

[Blue Valkyrie]

Hopefully in on transfer window day 1.

 

[mooey]

Not for me thought he was very average player porto and liverpool don t rate him we need a striker we are strong in every position apart from up front.waste of money when we have for decent midfielders

 

[The Rivet]

Not for me thought he was very average player porto and liverpool don t rate him we need a striker we are strong in every position apart from up front.waste of money when we have for decent midfielders

It's a loan not a purchase.

 

[CP 0 3 BHA]

Naylor has just poured cold water on this via Twitter.

 

[Blue Valkyrie]

Naylor has just poured cold water on this via Twitter.

That'll do me. Just like Zamora.

 

[Frutos]

That'll do me. Just like Zamora.

And CMS.

 

[mooey]

It's a loan not a purchase.

Still wages though

 

[BensGrandad]

I think that he would fit the no 10 role perfectly playing just behind GM mind I wanted us to sign him when he left Liverpool. If it is all agreed why cant he come now and train with us then sign at 0001 on 1st January.

 

[chrispyk]

Joao is on the bench tonight for their league match.

 

[midnight_rendezvous]

Said it before and I'll say it again - I don't see the point in buying a no.10 when we play 4-4-2. Tex doesn't fit into CH's current system so unless he changes the system that has proven so effective it'd be a bit pointless. We need a pacey striker (an upgrade or an understudy for Baldock) not a number 10.

 

[HantsSeagull]

Naylor has just poured cold water on this via Twitter.

its a certainty then. lump on large.

 

[Hugo Rune]

Joao is on the bench tonight for their league match.

Good. That means he should be fit.

 

[BensGrandad]

Said it before and I'll say it again - I don't see the point in buying a no.10 when we play 4-4-2. Tex doesn't fit into CH's current system so unless he changes the system that has proven so effective it'd be a bit pointless. We need a pacey striker (an upgrade or an understudy for Baldock) not a number 10.

He could fill that role perfectly well as the 2nd striker playjng off GM.

 

[dwayne]

This would make total sense. It's the position we are looking for. He already knows the lads and is still in contact with bruno and kayal. I believe he shares same agent as some of the Albion's players as well.

We don't have too much to lose here......

Sent from my SM-G9350 using Tapatalk

 

[DavidinSouthampton]

Said it before and I'll say it again - I don't see the point in buying a no.10 when we play 4-4-2. Tex doesn't fit into CH's current system so unless he changes the system that has proven so effective it'd be a bit pointless. We need a pacey striker (an upgrade or an understudy for Baldock) not a number 10.

That's why we were trying to buy Pritchard as a no. 10, then.

 

[Triggaaar]

Also the last bit translates as Brighton are currently 20th in the Championship.

I've just had the most vivid dream ever.

 

[DavidinSouthampton]

I'd love to see this happen. Gave us some good stuff to watch.

 

[Wrong-Direction]

Yes do it

Sent from my SM-A310F using Tapatalk

 

[midnight_rendezvous]

That's why we were trying to buy Pritchard as a no. 10, then.

Yes - before the season got into full swing. Why change the formation now when we are second in the table?