Is Lua Lua Suspended for Charlton? (Apparently so according to his tweets)

[SockMonster]

Says he is on BBC website. I didn't realise.

 

[Goldstone1976]

I saw the same thing and wondered about it. He might be - he got a yellow v Huddersfield and might now have gone over the totting up limit for a one-game ban....?

 

[saafend_seagull]

BBC team page has him and Bruno on 5 yellows.

 

[HAILSHAM SEAGULL]

No, but he is one booking away from a suspension

 

[seagullsovergrimsby]

I think he is only on 4 yellow cards.

 

[Peter Grummit]

Yes, FA site confirms it http://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/suspensions

rats, he normally has a top game there.

PG

 

[Goldstone1976]

Yes, FA site confirms it http://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/suspensions

rats, he normally has a top game there.

PG

The club website and the Argus both think he has four yellows, so is available for Charlton.

http://www.seagulls.co.uk/stats/player-stats/

http://www.theargus.co.uk/sport/10894243.Crofts_given_rest_by_Albion_to_prevent_burnout/

Wow - so who can't count to 5?!

He definitely picked one up v Huddersfield, so perhaps that's the "missing" one, if there is indeed a missing one...

 

[Taybha]

Since when did the FA know anything about football , ive checked the situation with Agnes next door , and she has confirmed indeed the FA are a total waste of paper clips and Lulu is on 4 yellow cards not 5

 

[seagullsovergrimsby]

Since when did the FA know anything about football , ive checked the situation with Agnes next door , and she has confirmed indeed the FA are a total waste of paper clips and Lulu is on 4 yellow cards not 5

The question needing an answer is - Will we be fined for fielding an ineligible player on Boxing Day because the FA is never wrong ?

 

[BensGrandad]

I would expect the club to have confirmed the situation with the FA before today

 

[TSB]

Yes, FA site confirms it http://www.thefa.com/football-rules-governance/suspensions

rats, he normally has a top game there.

PG

Now says 'down for maintenance'. Clarification of Kaz situation brings FA.com to its knees.

 

[Taybha]

The question needing an answer is - Will we be fined for fielding an inedible player on Boxing Day because the FA is never wrong ?

I dont think the FA will fine us just because Lualua would'nt taste nice , no , but ............. .

 

[seagullsovergrimsby]

I dont think the FA will fine us just because Lualua would'nt taste nice , no , but ............. .

 

[HAILSHAM SEAGULL]

According to Naylor in the Argus, he is available, but needs to avoid another booking in the next two games before they are wiped out.

 

[seagullsovergrimsby]

According to Naylor in the Argus, he is available, but needs to avoid another booking in the next two games before they are wiped out.

They don't get wiped out , the number of bookings before a suspension rises to 10

 

[227 BHA]

They don't get wiped out , the number of bookings before a suspension rises to 10

Which is effectively the same as being wiped out as he has to start again and accumulate another 5! Doh!

 

[SeagullSongs]

Which is effectively the same as being wiped out as he has to start again and accumulate another 5! Doh!

Although players who are on 3 will have to accumulate another 7, so it's not really like them being wiped out. More like subtracting five.

Or it's just easier to think that the limit increases to 10.

 

[227 BHA]

Although players who are on 3 will have to accumulate another 7, so it's not really like them being wiped out. More like subtracting five.

Or it's just easier to think that the limit increases to 10.

Yes but this thread is about LuaLua not the others. Hence the point I was making