portlock seagull
Well-known member
- Jul 28, 2003
- 17,777
It’s a generous start.
Anyone that pisses off Trump and stands up to the bully is alright by me.
Well, he didn't HAVE to give anything, but its a significant gesture IMO that sets an example that others can follow.
Its like our own Bruno donating 1% of his salary to the Common Goal charity to aid the poor and underprivileged around the world, along with Juan Mata. Could he afford more ? Undoubtedly. But he didn't have to do it, and hopefully it sets a trend for other people in a position to do so to follow.
But it’s not is it? Relativity has nothing to do with it when you’re talking hundreds of billions remaining in someone’s personal fortune. I’m fairly confident Jeff could get by comfortably with just a billion.
The überrich use charitys and foundations to play with tax relief laws. Usually when I say that we should kill the 0,00001%, someone says "oh they do much more than you, look at the money the donate". Well, ****ing look at the harm they make.
is it ungenerous? would you rather it not be donated? im sure some would say it should be taxed, though overlooks most this wealth is in assets that are not taxed.