Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
Ian Hutley is suing the Govt (Read Taxpayer)
- Thread starter Tim Over Whelmed
- Start date
bhaexpress
New member
People like Huntley are a very good reason for legalising euthanasia.
- Thread starter
- #23
I'd hate to think how much it costs us each year to "look after" this murdering bastard, he is on a special wing, probably 24 hour suicide watch and no doubt getting some very expensive rehabilitation treatment ... meanwhile good honest people can't afford dental care, medical care, education, housing etc
- Thread starter
- #25
glasfryn
cleaning up cat sick
my immediate thoughts were that the little scroat that slashed him was probably in a fit of temper over his notoriety rather that him having any sympathy for the girls parents or in fact the girls.
these guys in prison for so called public outrage crimes are mixing with others that don't get that notoriety or publicity but have most likely committed crimes as bad if not worse that Huntley.
I'm not a great believer in capital punishment .......but there are those who suit that sentence particularly in the past few decades.
these guys in prison for so called public outrage crimes are mixing with others that don't get that notoriety or publicity but have most likely committed crimes as bad if not worse that Huntley.
I'm not a great believer in capital punishment .......but there are those who suit that sentence particularly in the past few decades.
sydney
tinky ****in winky
sorry , but i would have thought that by violating the laws of your country of residence and being put AWAY , you may forfeit your right to civil compensation of any kind, ZZZZZAPP the fucker....and get his lawyer to hold his hand...!!
- Thread starter
- #28
If only, a prisoner in the UK has more rights than any sane nation would allow. I don't believe in capital punishment but I do think it should be the sentence for anyone who tries to commit suicide!
glasfryn
cleaning up cat sick
If only, a prisoner in the UK has more rights than any sane nation would allow. I don't believe in capital punishment but I do think it should be the sentence for anyone who tries to commit suicide!
F00k me half the country would be gone inside or out
there would not be enough wood the build the scaffolds
hang on a minute I thought this was the Thatcher thread...........................lol
TrickyOne
New member
Guilty as charged, hang the fecker, and hang him high!
London Pompous
Active member
- Feb 16, 2008
- 660
Cost too much to arrange mate, let Armadillo Pete, Scratchcard, Big Vern and me pop into his cell, and SORTED, say no more.
Never had this SCUM around when Reg and Ronnie were in charge.
I disagree.
Regardless of what a **** is using it, the issue here shouldn't be that legal aid is unfair, just perhaps the law allowing it to be used.
BensGrandad
New member
That was my point which I didnt make very clear. The legal aid sysytem should be monitored and applied with greater restrictions and not used for such civil actions.
seagullsovergrimsby
#cpfctinpotclub
Serial paedo who deserves to die very painfully. He got a job working in a school as a caretaker because the CRB didn't cross check against his previous surname (he changed his name by deed poll from Nixon to Huntley). OB in Grimsby knew about his predeliction for teenage girls from 3 separate incidents.
Funny that....he brings it in and she makes thousands if not not more from it...benefits nobody but criminals and terrorists......Good old labour....f***ing the people of Britain for 13 years!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Firstly, it is a travesty that the ignorant attacker didn't have a better understanding of human biology before scratching Huntley's neck with a razorblade.
Secondly, why are people banging on about the human rights act. Even without that he probably would have been able to sue for breach of care.
As for Bensgrandad comical suggestion that Tony and Cherie were in cahoots when formulating legislation. Somehow I doubt Blair drafted and proof read any documents.
As regards legal aid, what they should allow is for lawyers to take on these cases on the basis of no win no fee. At the moment they see it as cash cow and irrespective of the result they get their fee. Perhaps if they had to stump up their fees in advance themselves with the possibility of not getting them back they might not be so ready to jump into bed with the scum.
Wouldn't it be good if the case went to a jury and all the evidence showed Huntley was entitled to compensation and the judge directed the jury to rule in his favour and all twelve said stuff you and voted against him.
Secondly, why are people banging on about the human rights act. Even without that he probably would have been able to sue for breach of care.
As for Bensgrandad comical suggestion that Tony and Cherie were in cahoots when formulating legislation. Somehow I doubt Blair drafted and proof read any documents.
As regards legal aid, what they should allow is for lawyers to take on these cases on the basis of no win no fee. At the moment they see it as cash cow and irrespective of the result they get their fee. Perhaps if they had to stump up their fees in advance themselves with the possibility of not getting them back they might not be so ready to jump into bed with the scum.
Wouldn't it be good if the case went to a jury and all the evidence showed Huntley was entitled to compensation and the judge directed the jury to rule in his favour and all twelve said stuff you and voted against him.
User Removed
New member
If you're going to start a heated topic such as this, at least get the name of individual right you twat.
NMH
Banned
We don't have capital punishment in this country, so prison is for punishment and rehabilitation of the criminal as well as securing the public domain from their presence/activities in it.
The justice system fails when a man like Moat is released (particularly when early!) knowing that he's still a danger on the outside - but anyone serving time given is entitled to full release and freedom.
My outlook on this Huntley guy, is that killing him would be generous and preempt the fulfilling of his term. However, his living in fear, loathing, spite and disdain in a miserable place suits him to a tee. Another attack on him is 'job done', and if he gained any fee from this - what would he do with the money anyway? Let him sue, and even win his £96,000. He can't spend the dosh anyway.
The justice system fails when a man like Moat is released (particularly when early!) knowing that he's still a danger on the outside - but anyone serving time given is entitled to full release and freedom.
My outlook on this Huntley guy, is that killing him would be generous and preempt the fulfilling of his term. However, his living in fear, loathing, spite and disdain in a miserable place suits him to a tee. Another attack on him is 'job done', and if he gained any fee from this - what would he do with the money anyway? Let him sue, and even win his £96,000. He can't spend the dosh anyway.
- Thread starter
- #39
You weren't driving East along the A27 last night, were you?
BensGrandad
New member
It was meant as a light hearted comment a bit tongue in cheek.