tommynockers
New member
- Dec 6, 2013
- 297
Not usually superstitious but worth a go. Get the retro look in as well.
Not usually superstitious but worth a go. Get the retro look in as well.
1979/80 and 80/81 could be deemed relatively successful but you forget that we were in stripes when we were promoted! Also, can the subsequent years be classified as successful, notwithstanding a cup final appearance, we struggled and narrowly avoided relegation in one year and got relegated the next.
Yeah but you're using facts to back up your argument, so that don't count right?1979/80 and 80/81 could be deemed relatively successful but you forget that we were in stripes when we were promoted! Also, can the subsequent years be classified as successful, notwithstanding a cup final appearance, we struggled and narrowly avoided relegation in one year and got relegated the next.
Ha ha! and never promoted when wearing all blue, only relegated but apart from that great idea OP! ha ha ha he he ho hoPromoted wearing "Stripes, stripes, blue and white" - 1957/58, 1971/72, 1976/77, 1978/79, 1986/87, 2000/01, 20001/02, 2003/04, 2010/11.
Having said that, I thought that the mid-1960s kit of royal blue shirts with white sleeves and Brighton and Hove crest looked classy. Shame about some of the football then!
I vote for kit with no stick-on, peel-off sponsor labels, but as it's nike it won't happen.
So you also didn't like any of the the kits of the 80s and 90s then where none of the kits had sublimation?
In fact only 7 of the last 25 home shirts have had sponsors logos/names dyed into the material.
to be fair, our highest position in history was 1981/2 season in all blue. I think it was still only 2 points for a win and although not terrible to watch the old style Sam Allardyce would have been more impressed than say Wenger.I don't understand it...we're a team that wears blue and white stripes. Why change our proud heritage. It's almost as bad as red Bluebirds
All White with blue trim