[News] Huw Edwards

[jcdenton08]

But it's always reassuring that no matter what time of day or night that we decide to come on NSC for a bit of a rant (justified or otherwise) there is always someone spending every waking second prowling NSC in order to give an ironic thumbs up within seconds of your post

16 minutes late

 

[Weststander]

Absolutely . If a teacher was married and paying a young drug addicted vulnerable boy for rude pics / sending pics of his arse behind his families back then that would be equally disgusting and held in the same regard .

The fact he’s on 500k a year and works for the bbc makes it even worse

There’s been no suggestion of “boy”, this has been pointed out repeatedly in this thread and partly explains the police having no interest in a case. Beggars belief that weirdos keep conjuring up images of a child in their minds.

What’s his income got to do with anything?

 

[chickens]

There’s been no suggestion of “boy”, this has pointed out repeatedly in this thread and partly explains the police having no interest in a case. Beggars belief that weirdos keep conjuring up images of a child in their minds.

What’s his income got to do with anything?

“Rich Man Watches Porn”
The world was shocked today to learn that a man in his early 60s had watched pornography via the internet.

Our survey on the street today showed that precisely 0% of those surveyed had ever watched pornography via the internet, and were horrified that somebody might misuse the benign, notoriously kind technology for such a terrible purpose.

“I’ve only ever used the internet to donate to charities.” claimed Fergus, 19.

Another of those surveyed, who chose not to give their name, admitted “I do like looking at ****s, I’ve set my homepage to Conservative Home.”

 

[ManOfSussex]

But it's always reassuring that no matter what time of day or night that we decide to come on NSC for a bit of a rant (justified or otherwise) there is always someone spending every waking second prowling NSC in order to give an ironic thumbs up within seconds of your post

I even engaged with that/such a poster last night - he likes Celtic apparently.

 

[Harry Wilson's tackle]

There’s been no suggestion of “boy”, this has been pointed out repeatedly in this thread and partly explains the police having no interest in a case. Beggars belief that weirdos keep conjuring up images of a child in their minds.

What’s his income got to do with anything?

Good luck with employing reason and fair reflection about the known facts with that one. He knows it all, and there is nothing you can say to school him.

And he imagines people are interested in his opinions. Quaint I call it. Old school quaint. Mine's a pint of bitter, quaint.

 

[DavidinSouthampton]

“Rich Man Watches Porn”
The world was shocked today to learn that a man in his early 60s had watched pornography via the internet.

Our survey on the street today showed that precisely 0% of those surveyed had ever watched pornography via the internet, and were horrified that somebody might misuse the benign, notoriously kind technology for such a terrible purpose.

“I’ve only ever used the internet to donate to charities.” claimed Fergus, 19.

While another of those surveyed who chose not to give their name admitted “I do like looking at ****s, I’ve set my homepage to Conservative Home.”

Do you write for Private Eye?

 

[chickens]

Do you write for Private Eye?

You are far too kind. Much as I’d love to, I doubt I’m of a suitable calibre. I consider Private Eye a level above.

There is an entire ocean of hypocrisy in the reaction of some to this “story” however.

 

[DavidinSouthampton]

You are far too kind. Much as I’d love to, I doubt I’m of a suitable calibre. I consider Private Eye a level above.

There is an entire ocean of hypocrisy in the reaction of some to this “story” however.

I agree about the hypocrisy, and it’s all over the top.

it just seemed to echo - probably deliberately - some of the style of their funny bits, like “Man sits on chair and is given hat” as coverage for the Coronation .

 

[DJ NOBO]

For anyone interested this is a good round-up of the allegations.

Huw Edwards scandal: All the allegations made against BBC presenter

Presenter at centre of sex photo scandal still suspended by BBC

www.independent.co.uk

 

[cunning fergus]

“Rich Man Watches Porn”
The world was shocked today to learn that a man in his early 60s had watched pornography via the internet.

Our survey on the street today showed that precisely 0% of those surveyed had ever watched pornography via the internet, and were horrified that somebody might misuse the benign, notoriously kind technology for such a terrible purpose.

“I’ve only ever used the internet to donate to charities.” claimed Fergus, 19.

Another of those surveyed, who chose not to give their name, admitted “I do like looking at ****s, I’ve set my homepage to Conservative Home.”

If the rumours are true then this rich man not only watched porn, but spaffed 35k to get his kicks from the images and vids he could procure from a young drug addict online, hardly xhamster is it?

A young drug addict currently residing in a hotel, with the wherewithal to appoint a lawyer to act on his behalf and refute any criminal activity from his rich and powerful sponsor.

Sure, all well and good say the opponents of the #metoo movement and supporters of how older rich and influential people exploit the young poor and powerless for their degenerate sexual gratification.

Let’s not worry about the young drug addict, the family of the young drug addict or Huw’s only family dragged into the spotlight as a consequence of his weird sexual practices, unless of course they knew?

Not that his employers with their own record of indulging rich and powerful sexual predators were not concerned themselves, with their own investigation taking place into his conduct as this story landed.

So, let’s forget all that, because all this information has caused poor Huw to check into the priory as oppose to clear his name and explain his conduct. I have my doubts he is there shaking like a shitting dog and jabbering like a monkey…………more likely he’s back on line pulling out another 35k set piece.

#prayforHugh.

 

[cunning fergus]

This broom has had 17 new heads and 14 new handles…..

I remember that joke, Danny Baker did it when he was pulled off air………..

 

[chickens]

If the rumours are true then this rich man not only watched porn, but spaffed 35k to get his kicks from the images and vids he could procure from a young drug addict online, hardly xhamster is it?

A young drug addict currently residing in a hotel, with the wherewithal to appoint a lawyer to act on his behalf and refute any criminal activity from his rich and powerful sponsor.

Sure, all well and good say the opponents of the #metoo movement and supporters of how older rich and influential people exploit the young poor and powerless for their degenerate sexual gratification.

Let’s not worry about the young drug addict, the family of the young drug addict or Huw’s only family dragged into the spotlight as a consequence of his weird sexual practices, unless of course they knew?

Not that his employers with their own record of indulging rich and powerful sexual predators were not concerned themselves, with their own investigation taking place into his conduct as this story landed.

So, let’s forget all that, because all this information has caused poor Huw to check into the priory as oppose to clear his name and explain his conduct. I have my doubts he is there shaking like a shitting dog and jabbering like a monkey…………more likely he’s back on line pulling out another 35k set piece.

#prayforHugh.

If…
If we had any solid information at all, there might be a story. All we have is nasty innuendo. Here are some facts:

1. No criminality has taken place, two separate police forces have confirmed this.

2. There has been no suggestion that Huw Edwards had any part in this individual setting up the webpage from which they offered their services. Their services were available to all, and set up by a consenting adult who chose to make money this way. Mr Edwards as a private individual used a perfectly legal commercial service.

In addition to the above, I ask the following questions:

3. Did the individual advertise their drug addiction? I’m delighted to hear that prior to watching pornography you perform background checks on the performers to ensure there are no addiction or wellbeing issues. However, I suggest you’re in the minority. To suggest Mr Edwards would have had prior knowledge of any addiction issues seems far-fetched.

4. Do you persist in your bizarre assertion that any transaction between two individuals makes the wealthier and more powerful of the two an abuser, and the poorer of the two a victim of abuse?

If so, I hope you don’t suffer too much from the absolute gangbanging you’re going to get when you’re told to get the coffees in at work.

#prayforpornstars

 

[Scappa]

It looks as though flagship's posts have been removed from this thread, which is probably for the best considering this gem from the Tories In Meltdown thread

 

[Mo Gosfield]

A polarised debate which has probably run its course now. We should let poor Huw rebuild his life/career/reputation in the comfort and sanctity of the Priory and move onto more important issues.

 

[rogersix]

If the rumours are true then this rich man not only watched porn, but spaffed 35k to get his kicks from the images and vids he could procure from a young drug addict online, hardly xhamster is it?

A young drug addict currently residing in a hotel, with the wherewithal to appoint a lawyer to act on his behalf and refute any criminal activity from his rich and powerful sponsor.

Sure, all well and good say the opponents of the #metoo movement and supporters of how older rich and influential people exploit the young poor and powerless for their degenerate sexual gratification.

Let’s not worry about the young drug addict, the family of the young drug addict or Huw’s only family dragged into the spotlight as a consequence of his weird sexual practices, unless of course they knew?

Not that his employers with their own record of indulging rich and powerful sexual predators were not concerned themselves, with their own investigation taking place into his conduct as this story landed.

So, let’s forget all that, because all this information has caused poor Huw to check into the priory as oppose to clear his name and explain his conduct. I have my doubts he is there shaking like a shitting dog and jabbering like a monkey…………more likely he’s back on line pulling out another 35k set piece.

#prayforHugh.

you don't like the bbc, do you

 

[rogersix]

A polarised debate which has probably run its course now. We should let poor Huw rebuild his life/career/reputation in the comfort and sanctity of the Priory and move onto more important issues.

BREXIT!

 

[The Clamp]

35k on some saucy pics.

That’s just ridiculous money.

 

[Questions]

35k on some saucy pics.

That’s just ridiculous money.

The ones I have of Huw are really good.

 

[The Clamp]

Sun and Mail publishers examine claims against journalist Dan Wootton

GB News presenter facing allegations he inappropriately offered colleagues large sums in return for sexual material

www.theguardian.com

Don’t worry everyone, the Sun and The Mail are on the case

 

[chickens]

35k on some saucy pics.

That’s just ridiculous money.

You’d have done it for half that?