Voroshilov said:Typical lack of thought on the responses here.
The NHS has limited resources and therefore one of the key issues is efficient allocation of funds. The unanswered question is if patients in other areas went untreated because there was an unequal distribution of resources to this particular area.
Good pointLes Biehn said:So the solution is to put this hospital further in the red?
Les Biehn said:So the solution is to put this hospital further in the red?
But if the Government are the ones giving the fine, will they then give further finance to them?hampden park said:being in the red shows that they have spent all their money and guarantee themselves some more
BHA Jordan said:But if the Government are the ones giving the fine, will they then give further finance to them?
Westdene Seagull said:Only a brainless pen pushing bean counter would think fining a hospital £2.5m for treating people too quickly was a good idea. All it does is take resources away from the local people who need them.
What were they meant to do - have doctors and nurses sitting around twiddling their thumbs but still getting paid.
As an NHS customer ( which is of course what all us tax payers are ) I expect, no DEMAND, that when I need treatment that it is given the minute resources are available. If some mindless NHS so called manager thinks otherwise then I'm happy to have a meeting with them and see if they mind waiting to have their injuries treated !!!!!
Voroshilov said:You've not really understood what's going on have you.
Let me explain
Let's say you have 10 beers and 5 Albion fans.
Each fan would like all the beers, but if they drank them all the other 4 would have no relief from watching Hammond shin the only chance of the game into row z.
They decide to share the beers equally.
One fan - let's call him Dwayne- is a selfish ginger tosser and ignores the deal and drinks 6 bottles by himself. He has to go home to mummy.
The other four fans are left with just a bottle each and therefore receive only half the anaesthetic they were promised, so they are horribly sober while watching Mark McGhee bring on Kerry Mayo for Kazim-Richards when we are 2-0 down and chasing the game.
They go round Dwaynes house and give him a good kicking (despite him being some super-ninja or summink)
Do you understand now.
Voroshilov said:You've not really understood what's going on have you.
Let me explain
Let's say you have 10 beers and 5 Albion fans.
Each fan would like all the beers, but if they drank them all the other 4 would have no relief from watching Hammond shin the only chance of the game into row z.
They decide to share the beers equally.
One fan - let's call him Dwayne- is a selfish ginger tosser and ignores the deal and drinks 6 bottles by himself. He has to go home to mummy.
The other four fans are left with just a bottle each and therefore receive only half the anaesthetic they were promised, so they are horribly sober while watching Mark McGhee bring on Kerry Mayo for Kazim-Richards when we are 2-0 down and chasing the game.
They go round Dwaynes house and give him a good kicking (despite him being some super-ninja or summink)
Do you understand now.
Westdene Seagull said:And the bar gets fined £2.5m for serving too much beer to Dwayne and so can't afford to re-stock for any other fans at the next mindnumbingly boring match - result EVERYONE loses !!!
Do YOU understand now ?