seagulls4ever
New member
- Oct 2, 2003
- 4,338
Yes.
So you missed the part where I said "He's saying it's possible that the pensioner may have lied, and the person never did break into his home"?
How ever unlikely it may be, it's possible for someone to lie and say someone broke into their house after they killed them, when the person they killed never broke into their house in the first place. People can stage things. So basically, it's highly likely that the person broke into his house, but the police cannot automatically assume this from the start. That would be a very dangerous precedent to set, don't you think?