#### Highlights ####

[AmexRuislip]

http://www.skysports.com/watch/video/10596209/ipswich-0-0-brighton

 

[LamieRobertson]

http://www.skysports.com/watch/video/10596209/ipswich-0-0-brighton

So the sending off and...........

 

[AmexRuislip]

So the sending off and...........

It did not seem that bad from the extended highlights that have been shown!!
I've seen worse.
I reckon the ref is sponsered by Clintons.

 

[LamieRobertson]

It did not seem that bad from the extended highlights that have been shown!!
I've seen worse.
I reckon the ref is sponsered by Clintons.

I''d best watch it then

2nd booking looks soft

 

[Sheebo]

Sounds like a county league atmosphere - don't ever moan about the Amex atmo people

 

[Dirk Lehmann's Python]

Sounds like a county league atmosphere - don't ever moan about the Amex atmo people

Careful or you'll have Return of the Rev and his mate pop up to discuss Haywards ****ing Heath

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

 

[kevo]

Been here before, but far too many sott reds these days. Was Stephens' conduct so bad he really didn't deserve to stay on the pitch? A bit of lip to the ref and a clumsy challenge and he's off.

 

[GT49er]

http://www.skysports.com/watch/video/10596209/ipswich-0-0-brighton

Thanks for posting and all that, but I think your thread title needs to be reviewed in the light of the trade descriptions act.............

 

[hampshirebrightonboy]

Been here before, but far too many sott reds these days. Was Stephens' conduct so bad he really didn't deserve to stay on the pitch? A bit of lip to the ref and a clumsy challenge and he's off.

Maybe we should appeal. If it's too harsh the FA will recind it - there're a decent bunch.

 

[Green Cross Code Man]

Sounds like a county league atmosphere - don't ever moan about the Amex atmo people

I thought that listening on the radio. There were extended periods where there was genuinely no atmosphere. Just the sound of the players. I think I heard a cow mooing art one point, but that may have been my imagination.

 

[AmexRuislip]

Thanks for posting and all that, but I think your thread title needs to be reviewed in the light of the trade descriptions act.............

I was going to call it "crylights", but I thought I'd get chastised for that, you know.................

 

[Joey Jo Jo Jr. Shabadoo]

Maybe we should appeal. If it's too harsh the FA will recind it - there're a decent bunch.

I don't think you can appeal a sending off when it was for two bookable offences. Stephens knows the new rule about dissent so only really has himself to blame even if the second yellow is a bit soft, if he'd kept his gob shut earlier he'd have not been sent off.

 

[AmexRuislip]

I thought that listening on the radio. There were extended periods where there was genuinely no atmosphere. Just the sound of the players. I think I heard a cow mooing art one point, but that may have been my imagination.

That was farmer McCarthy getting the feed ready for his Inbredshire cattle breed.

 

[hampshirebrightonboy]

I don't think you can appeal a sending off when it was for two bookable offences. Stephens knows the new rule about dissent so only really has himself to blame even if the second yellow is a bit soft, if he'd kept his gob shut earlier he'd have not been sent off.

I wasn't serious. We know they are a bunch of ***** and would not give us anything.

 

[Chinman3000]

Maybe we should appeal. If it's too harsh the FA will recind it - there're a decent bunch.

EDIT - discussed

 

[hans kraay fan club]

Been here before, but far too many sott reds these days. Was Stephens' conduct so bad he really didn't deserve to stay on the pitch? A bit of lip to the ref and a clumsy challenge and he's off.

There was a third poor tackle, earlier, when he might have gone. The ref had a word, and it was obvious he was on a final chance.